|

|
|
|
Posts: 706
Joined: May 2016
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,349
Posts56,545
Members992
| |
Most Online4,295 Yesterday at 09:40 PM
|
|
|
#3173
Thu May 22, 2003 2:37 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,026 Likes: 274
Head Honcho
|
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,026 Likes: 274 |
Linda, Perhaps I didn't word things well enough!  "Authority" is an important matter, but not, IMHO when it is used as an argument for women in office. What I tried to convey is that aside from the issue of authority, the fundamental issue is who qualifies for the office rather than what the office entails. By allowing the authority issue to enter into the debate, it gives the opposition the opportunity to redefine what authority is, etc...  In reply to: does "husband of one wife" mean you cannot be divorced?
This is another hotly debated subject. But I have concluded that Paul is forbidding practicing bigamists from office. The literal translation of the Greek is actually, "one wife's husband", which lends itself to the bigamy interpretation more than the issue of divorce. If one would want to make the text mean that no divorcees are qualified to serve, then to be consistent, it must also mean that no widowers are qualified either. 
In His Grace,
simul iustus et peccator
|
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Female deacons?
|
James
|
Wed May 21, 2003 7:57 AM
|
Re: Female deacons?
|
J_Edwards
|
Wed May 21, 2003 10:13 AM
|
Re: Female deacons?
|
Pilgrim
|
Wed May 21, 2003 11:41 AM
|
Re: Female deacons?
|
J_Edwards
|
Wed May 21, 2003 3:24 PM
|
Re: Female deacons?
|
James
|
Thu May 22, 2003 8:28 AM
|
Re: Female deacons?
|
J_Edwards
|
Thu May 22, 2003 10:45 AM
|
Re: Female deacons?
|
James
|
Thu May 22, 2003 11:06 AM
|
Re: Female deacons?
|
J_Edwards
|
Thu May 22, 2003 11:22 AM
|
Re: Female deacons?
|
James
|
Thu May 22, 2003 11:28 AM
|
Re: Female deacons?
|
J_Edwards
|
Thu May 22, 2003 11:48 AM
|
Re: Female deacons?
|
James
|
Thu May 22, 2003 12:09 PM
|
Re: Female deacons?
|
J_Edwards
|
Thu May 22, 2003 12:23 PM
|
Re: Female deacons?
|
James
|
Thu May 22, 2003 12:29 PM
|
Re: Female deacons?
|
Pilgrim
|
Thu May 22, 2003 11:23 AM
|
Re: Female deacons?
|
James
|
Thu May 22, 2003 11:57 AM
|
Re: Female deacons?
|
Pilgrim
|
Thu May 22, 2003 12:14 PM
|
Re: Female deacons?
|
James
|
Thu May 22, 2003 12:19 PM
|
Re: Female deacons?
|
Pilgrim
|
Thu May 22, 2003 12:26 PM
|
Re: Female deacons?
|
J_Edwards
|
Thu May 22, 2003 3:20 PM
|
Re: Female deacons?
|
Anonymous
|
Thu May 22, 2003 5:03 PM
|
Re: Female deacons?
|
li0scc0
|
Thu May 22, 2003 5:08 PM
|
Re: Female deacons?
|
Anonymous
|
Thu May 22, 2003 5:11 PM
|
Re: Female deacons?
|
li0scc0
|
Thu May 22, 2003 5:39 PM
|
Re: Female deacons?
|
Anonymous
|
Thu May 22, 2003 5:48 PM
|
Re: Female deacons?
|
Pilgrim
|
Thu May 22, 2003 5:42 PM
|
Re: Female deacons?
|
Anonymous
|
Thu May 22, 2003 5:55 PM
|
Re: Female deacons?
|
Pilgrim
|
Thu May 22, 2003 6:37 PM
|
Re: Female deacons?
|
J_Edwards
|
Thu May 22, 2003 6:43 PM
|
Re: Female deacons?
|
Anonymous
|
Fri May 23, 2003 2:45 PM
|
Re: Female deacons?
|
Pilgrim
|
Thu May 22, 2003 5:14 PM
|
Re: Female deacons?
|
li0scc0
|
Thu May 22, 2003 5:22 PM
|
Re: Female deacons?
|
James
|
Fri May 23, 2003 8:12 AM
|
Re: Female deacons?
|
J_Edwards
|
Fri May 23, 2003 9:49 AM
|
Re: Female deacons?
|
James
|
Fri May 23, 2003 10:44 AM
|
Re: Female deacons?
|
J_Edwards
|
Fri May 23, 2003 1:33 PM
|
Re: Female deacons?
|
Pilgrim
|
Fri May 23, 2003 1:59 PM
|
Re: Female deacons?
|
Anonymous
|
Thu May 22, 2003 5:14 PM
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
123
guests, and
64
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|