Do you believe in order for one to be Reformed (truly Reformed) that they must believe in the 5 solas? If yes, then how do you explain
Sola Scriptura with the Charismatic belief of continued revelation; i.e. tongues and interpretation?
PS: Martyn Lloyd-Jones taught the Baptism of the Holy Spirit as a distinct experience to conversion, but according to Murray and several that knew him (one which I just spoke with the other day that is friends with his son) they state that he did not speak in tongues...
I was against Pentecostalism and still am. My doctrine of the baptism of the Spirit is that it gives full assurance. I have never been satisfied with any speaking in tongues that I have heard. (…) It is very unfair to put the label Pentecostal on me
Lloyd-Jones, Martin, Prove All Things, Banner of Truth Trust.
Thus, according to your definition
here of "Reformed Charismatic," (When I say "Reformed Charismatic", I am referring to people who embrace the doctrines of grace, but believe to one degree or another that gifts like tongues etc... are still around today.) I must answer, "NO." However, I am familiar with several that do consider him Charismatic and depending on one's definition of the term ... or a given context, then ... it depends on what your definition of Reformed is ... Thus, the reason for my post asking you to define your terms more exactly ...
