|

|
|
|
Posts: 706
Joined: May 2016
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,348
Posts56,544
Members992
| |
Most Online2,383 Jan 12th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 591
Addict
|
Addict
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 591 |
Thanks Joe, Joe quoted: the Reconstructionists go further and set a course of world conquest or ''dominion,'' claiming a Biblically prophesied ''inevitable victory (Apologetics Index). All of this is quite confusing to me with an added, nearly unfathomable complexity. It is very hard for a layman such as I to try and understand where any of these reconstructionist are coming from. As you said, "Ideas have consequences", and their ideas (reconstructionist adherents) are causing great consternation, sometimes vicious opposition and confusion in the public sphere as well as in our churches. Personally, I don't see any sort of "Political Mandate" in Scripture. They explain how they got from VT to Recon... I'm very afraid the reconstructionist explainations would go over my head also. So, I have three questions, and I hope they're not just rhetorical. How do the reconstructionists consolidate their ideas with; "My kingdom is not of this world"? Is it a postmillenial eschatology (or something else) that might be driving these reconstructionists in the first place? I do believe that premillenial dispensationalism has had a devastating and destructive impact on American foreign policy. Might not this "reconstructionism" have the same negative and damaging impact on American internal affairs? It's very hard for me not to say that this reconstructionist movement appears to me to be very suspiciously Roman Catholic in nature. Denny Romans 3:22-24
Denny
Simon Peter answered Him, "Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life." [John 6:68]
|
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Rushdoony, Bahnsen and Van Til
|
Theo
|
Sun Jan 07, 2007 12:10 AM
|
Re: Rushdoony, Bahnsen and Van Til
|
J_Edwards
|
Sun Jan 07, 2007 5:18 AM
|
Re: Rushdoony, Bahnsen and Van Til
|
john
|
Sun Jan 07, 2007 7:52 AM
|
Theonomy
|
Tom
|
Tue Jan 16, 2007 1:37 AM
|
Re: Theonomy
|
J_Edwards
|
Thu Jan 18, 2007 6:47 AM
|
Re: Theonomy
|
Tom
|
Fri Jan 19, 2007 5:18 AM
|
Re: Rushdoony, Bahnsen and Van Til
|
John_C
|
Sun Jan 07, 2007 1:05 PM
|
Re: Rushdoony, Bahnsen and Van Til
|
Theo
|
Sun Jan 07, 2007 8:18 PM
|
Re: Rushdoony, Bahnsen and Van Til
|
J_Edwards
|
Mon Jan 08, 2007 4:01 PM
|
Re: Rushdoony, Bahnsen and Van Til
|
Adopted
|
Mon Jan 08, 2007 7:06 PM
|
Re: Rushdoony, Bahnsen and Van Til
|
J_Edwards
|
Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:12 PM
|
Re: Rushdoony, Bahnsen and Van Til
|
Adopted
|
Tue Jan 09, 2007 8:55 PM
|
Re: Rushdoony, Bahnsen and Van Til
|
Pilgrim
|
Tue Jan 09, 2007 3:00 AM
|
Re: Rushdoony, Bahnsen and Van Til
|
John_C
|
Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:10 PM
|
Re: Rushdoony, Bahnsen and Van Til
|
J_Edwards
|
Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:24 PM
|
Rushdoony
|
William
|
Tue Jan 09, 2007 11:04 PM
|
Re: Rushdoony
|
Theo
|
Tue Jan 09, 2007 11:57 PM
|
Re: Rushdoony
|
Adopted
|
Wed Jan 10, 2007 12:31 AM
|
Re: Rushdoony, Bahnsen and Van Til
|
missionaryman
|
Wed Jan 10, 2007 3:04 AM
|
Re: Rushdoony, Bahnsen and Van Til
|
Theo
|
Thu Jan 11, 2007 6:17 AM
|
Re: Rushdoony, Bahnsen and Van Til
|
missionaryman
|
Sun Jan 14, 2007 3:54 AM
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
90
guests, and
33
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|