I'm not disputing that all men in both camps agree with one another, but there is linkeage. Maybe it's because some firmly in the FV camp today toyed with Theonomy before coming to become FVers.

The link may be in post-millennialism. Certainly many post-millennists are orthodox in their Christian approach to systematics; yet there is something about post-millennialism that draw some toward Theonomy and FV.

Why, I cannot say; but there are many cases that it does.

As a cavaet, I'm not saying that post-millennialism is the culprit in this, but for some reason people misuses it in forming their theology.


John Chaney

"having been firmly rooted and now being built up in Him and established in your faith . . ." Colossians 2:7