Originally Posted by Machaira
Which manuscripts contain the textual variant of which you speak? As far as I can tell, there are no variants for this pericope in the textual tradition.
Robert Candlish in his commentary on 1John (Geneva Series - BofT) makes mention of the textual variants which he himself deemed very persuasive, but makes no mention of the actual manuscript evidence. However, in B.F. Wescott's, The Epistles of St. John, he does list: "vg syrhl the Tert." as having omitted "ou" (not).


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]