Posts: 706
Joined: May 2016
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,347
Posts56,542
Members992
| |
Most Online2,383 Jan 12th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,025 Likes: 274
Head Honcho
|
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,025 Likes: 274 |
When I look at the teaching that I see by one who many consider a "New Calvinist" by the name of Mark Dever; I see anything but antinomianism. I am not saying that he agrees with every facet of the Reformed faith. However, I think he would be in agreement with almost everything written in the LBCF. At least from what I have read from his site and a book I read of his. Personally, I am not sure why he is considered a “New Calvinist”.  Tom, you seem to have this penchant for putting forth and defending Mark Dever in regard to the "New Calvinism".  I'm not privy to whether some have lumped him in with the movement or not. But be that as it may, even IF he has been mentioned as being one of those teaching the "New Calvinism", IF he was an exception, he would be just that... an EXCEPTION, which certainly doesn't negate the many criticism of the movement, which includes, for example, a rejection of the Regulative Principle of Worship, which is based upon the first two of the Ten Commandments. Many also reject the Fourth Commandment, i.e., they are anti-Sabbatarian. And some are blatantly guilty of violating the Second and Third Commandments, e.g., the flippant wearing of Jesus t-shirts, telling crude jokes, using profane language, ad nauseam while claiming to be a follower of the Lord Jesus Christ. Now, whether Mark Dever believes and/or practices any of the above, which is but a short list of sins and errors I'll leave it to you to find out. Whether he turns a blind eye to these things although personally opposing them, again I do not know, but I'll leave it to you to find out. Whether he cooperates with such people and participates in their gatherings, which in my mind shows he has little or no convictions about such things, I am not privy, but I'll leave that to you to find out. The point is, however, that Mark Dever the "New Calvinism" does not make or break.  The HISTORIC Reformed Confessions and Catechisms define what Calvinism, the Reformed Faith is and how it is to be practiced. That many are trying to "stretch" their meaning and obviscate the common practice/application of them which has been done for centuries is undeniable. But in so doing, they have no warrant to call themselves "Calvinists". 
simul iustus et peccator
|
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Resurgence of Calvinism?
|
GoldenTrout
|
Sat Jun 26, 2010 1:40 PM
|
Re: Resurgence of Calvinism?
|
Pilgrim
|
Sat Jun 26, 2010 2:09 PM
|
Re: Resurgence of Calvinism?
|
GoldenTrout
|
Sat Jun 26, 2010 2:33 PM
|
Re: Resurgence of Calvinism?
|
Renat Ilyasov
|
Sat Jun 26, 2010 4:28 PM
|
Re: Resurgence of Calvinism?
|
Tom
|
Sun Jun 27, 2010 3:43 AM
|
Re: Resurgence of Calvinism?
|
Johan
|
Wed Jun 30, 2010 6:44 AM
|
Re: Resurgence of Calvinism?
|
Pilgrim
|
Wed Jun 30, 2010 9:38 AM
|
Re: Resurgence of Calvinism?
|
Tom
|
Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:35 PM
|
Re: Resurgence of Calvinism?
|
Pilgrim
|
Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:56 PM
|
Re: Resurgence of Calvinism?
|
Tom
|
Wed Jul 07, 2010 1:26 AM
|
Re: Resurgence of Calvinism?
|
Pilgrim
|
Wed Jul 07, 2010 10:22 AM
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
636
guests, and
28
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|