Pilgrim
There is nothing in what you said that I would disagree with, except maybe the fact that I am not sure he meant what you think he meant when he said that (as you put it)
Quote
but then turns around and says the Bible could contain error.
I think we have both said enough about that aspect.
However, in the end you are correct that what matters is without the divinely inspired, infallible, inerrant Word of God, those historical events would never be known, never mind understood.

Part of me is quite disappointed in the fact that the article is supposedly written on a Reformed site, which has been of some help for me in the past. Though I need to admit that just because a site is recommended to me by a respected Reformed Christian, that it necessarily is a Reformed site. Nor does it mean that just because a site carries some good articles; that it should not be read with care and discernment.

Tom