Thank you for your reply and I'm dreadfully sorry if my opinion have botherd you by my stupidity.

Only one thing that I'd like to let you know that I'M ENTIRELY AGREED WITH YOU and with what you expose,
and I say that I had left my opinion of the above mentioned with "much" irony adressed to the women of nowadays in the evangelical churches who carelessly neglect these kinds of commands. (And they don't want to hear our suggestion, of course. By their ignorance? or by their pride? Who knows? Know that it's a simple history in local "modern" churches!)

Of course, the main point is definitive and irrefutable!!:

If you DECLARE that God finally recognises you by the merciful work of his beloved son on you,
why now you don't have a sense of honesty and obedience knowing that you're already under his Grace and his Watch, and that for what our Master gave his life for his Father and for each of us.(something similar in ref. Gal:2:21) So now we have only "yes" in front of his Eyes(2Co:1:19) as same as in front of his Commandments.

Now an another theme that comes and I'm sorry to propose you if my thought would bother you (I say it at first...):

How about the ones (believers) who are still in their ignorance or in their pride?
Of course, they really love (still their) God and are really eager to know Him (knowing also the Christ's work) but their way is not yet correct because of their arrogance or something like that...
So You'd like to force them to go with us in the church with same our dicipiline (that we've already recieved or obtained under his Mercy)? Or could you give them some time in order that they could "recieve" it at a certain moment?
I'd like to propose to you this position thinking of Peter's case. As we know very well, our Master has known his character, his tendency, his devotion to Him..., and also his faith! That's why He loved him anyway from beginning to the end (Jn:21:15-19). And after that, it really needed a long time for him but finally he understood the prepared sovreign purpose on his life to achieve, because his Lord was always with him. It tells us many things, I suppose.

Sooooo, what I'd like to say is that;

what it does matter to each of us who want reconcile with our Creator through our Mediator's graceful work, is that each of us could recieve, sooner or later but, CORRECTLY a "divine consciousness (/discernment)." And we're already persuaded that it is possible to recieve it if we ask him correctly. So..., in the case above, I'd like that such female members or belivers recognise their state and that they recieve this "conscience" (that the word I used before, incorrectly??), in order that they'd experience a divine relationship, our God's ultimate purpose to evry one He has chosen.

Sorry to expose my selfish opinion.


PS:
If it doesn't bother you, could you know something about and teach me if possible?:
---I think each epistle (of Paul, or Peter) was wrote destinated to each destination by the given actual situation, so why there is no reference about "the head covering" matter in the other ones? in spite of that we find various about the authority of women in church? Its problem always remains me (/us) indeed...
(Of course, it doesn't do affect the authory of the Scriptures on our life!!)






Personally I accept the Calvinistic Methodism that differs from Calivism or Methodism (of J.Weslay), and that seeks correctly a heart-felt relationship with our graceful God through the life and death manifested in this world of his beloved Son, our Intercessor.