The Highway Forums General Discussion Theology Discussion Forum WCF 28

IF that is the case, then you could... should? simply provide the articles; V & VI and ask this individual where baptismal regeneration or even presumptive regeneration is even hinted at in WCF 28? Regardless of some "Princetonian controversy", as a student of history, can you honestly conceive of there being credible arguments from those who have studied and know the history of the WCF that baptismal regeneration was even a fleeting thought in their minds? Having written the WCF not long after the Protestant Reformation and the deep hatred of the corrupt Roman State Church which practices baptismal regeneration, that view was one of the most disgusting albeit secondary to their faith+works=justification damnable heresy. Just a side note too, is despite their total rejection of baptismal regeneration, they did not make the sad mistake of throwing the baby out with the baptismal water as did the Baptists.