Originally Posted by John_C
Someone asked me the influece of Plato on amillenialism, and that is way beyond my paygrade. Then the subject of the closeness of amil and supersessionism came up. I haven't heard of supersessionism before but googling it seems to indicate it is replacement theology. I'm Amil, but disagree with the concept of replacement theology. Any help in responding to this?
I was going to respond, but then I read post #2 from Tom. I believe Tom said it well. Get used to it. Many use replacement theology as if it is truth and has some weight that an Amillennialist must work through. Totally false. If anyone has to prove their system correct its the dipsy's. And they have a tough time because of what Christ has done.


Blessings

Scripture doesn't merely point to truth—it is the truth - Charles Hodge.