In reply to:[color:"blue"]Jesus did say, however, that whoever had seen Him had seen the Father, so apparently whatever sense perceptory information His followers had was sufficient to communicate His divine nature to them.
And in this statement lies the confusion. Every one who saw The Christ had the same natural or physical "sense perceptory" apparatus and yet most rejected Him, never having seen Him spiritually. "Those who worship Him worship Him in spirit and in truth." To see Christ's Glory, or rather to get a glimpse of it in this life and in our current state, we must be given, by the opperation of the Spirit, "spiritual eyes". And the effectivness or clarity with which those eyes perceive spiritual things tends to come and go as the Spirit sovereignly desires.
I believe the second part of the following verse clearly states how we now see Christ, that is "after the flesh... no more", the incarnation now being finished:
2Cor5:16 Wherefore henceforth know we no man after the flesh: yea, though we have known Christ after the flesh, yet now henceforth know we him no more.
It would by my contention that in view of these things that devices designed to capture images within that range of the electromagnetic spectrum that we call visible light would have no ability to capture the full range of the "Light of the World" and thus would miss that divine light which so uniquely belongs to God, "who is light" and "dwells in Light", nor in my view is that light described by the electromagnetic spectrum likely to contain all (if it contains any) of His Light because of course He is infinate and the EMS is not.
