Donations for the month of January

We have received a total of "$0" in donations towards our goal of $175.

Don't want to use PayPal? Go HERE

Forum Search
Member Spotlight
Posts: 107
Joined: August 2021
Forum Statistics
Most Online732
Jan 15th, 2023
Top Posters
Pilgrim 14,351
Tom 4,403
chestnutmare 3,263
J_Edwards 2,615
Wes 1,856
John_C 1,854
RJ_ 1,583
MarieP 1,579
gotribe 1,060
Top Posters(30 Days)
Tom 16
Recent Posts
Left Wing News trying to Blackmail RW News
by Tom - Fri Jan 27, 2023 10:27 PM
by NetChaplain - Fri Jan 27, 2023 3:29 PM
The Blessings of Our Trials
by NetChaplain - Wed Jan 25, 2023 4:04 PM
Christian Political Broadcast
by Tom - Sat Jan 21, 2023 2:33 PM
Civil Government and the 1647 Westminster Confession
by Tom - Sat Jan 21, 2023 12:29 AM
Global Warming FIXED!
by Pilgrim - Fri Jan 20, 2023 3:57 PM
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Hop To
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,854
John_C Offline OP
Permanent Resident
OP Offline
Permanent Resident
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,854
(other OT feasts)

I do not have any reference books available and I wonder how to respond to those who argue for paedo-communion.

Their argument is that in the OT feasts everyone were invited to participate, so why should we prevent baptized children from doing the same.

Is the relationship between the Lord's Supper and Passover as direct as that of Baptism and Circumcision?

Is the reason for not allowing baptized children not to participate is strictly based on them not being able to examine themselves, or does it go into the core that they may not be saved.

Last edited by John_C; Mon May 09, 2005 9:26 AM.

John Chaney

"having been firmly rooted and now being built up in Him and established in your faith . . ." Colossians 2:7
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 85
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 85
Didn't the Passover include a test of maturity and understanding? As I recall, the youngest need to be of an age to ask what these thing meant and understand the answer.

Soli Deo Gloria
John Schultz
[Linked Image]
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 277
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 277
Are these the same folks that argue for infant baptism? If so they may not care about the examination part. That said, I've known some kids who are saved and know it and are MUCH better at self-examination than grown ups who want to save face more often than not.

To me, saying that the Lords Supper is equivalent to the Passover puts it in the realm of things like Catholic Eucharist (sp?) where the wafer becomes more than a symbol. The bread and the wine is no more effectual than the water in the baptistry. Its what happens on the inside that matters most.

"...the word of God is not bound."--2 Timothy 2:9
John_C said:
(other OT feasts)

I do not have any reference books available and I wonder how to respond to those who argue for paedo-communion.

The correct way to respond is with scripture alone not with human speculation or tradition. Infants are to be baptized because the promise belongs to them (Acts 2:38, 39) but infants are not to be communed until they can examine themselves (1 Cor. 11:28).

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 36 guests, and 24 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
PaulWatkins, His Unworthy Son, Nahum, TheSojourner, Larry
974 Registered Users
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31
Today's Birthdays
There are no members with birthdays on this day.
Popular Topics(Views)
1,419,503 Gospel truth