Posts: 706
Joined: May 2016
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,347
Posts56,542
Members992
| |
Most Online2,383 Jan 12th, 2026
|
|
|
#25421
Thu May 26, 2005 10:56 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 277
Enthusiast
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 277 |
I've been pondering the way these two fit together for awhile and I am wondering if an improper notion of Salvation, where it comes from, and how it comes about, etc., can have an adverse effect on the way a person who considers himself saved "works out" his salvation. For example, the SOS crowd (saved on Suday), the Baptist once saved always saved, and the Good Works crew. I'd appreciate some help talking through this.
P.S. I'm sure there's some dandy articles in here somewhere but I'd like to know what you all think too.
Josh "...the word of God is not bound."--2 Timothy 2:9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 416
Addict
|
Addict
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 416 |
Sorry Doulos, I am going to add a link here because it inforces my answer to you. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" /> I don't mean to go against your wishes, I'm just trying to give a good answer. "Arminian Errors" from here on The Highway The doctrine of soteriology is obviously very important to ones faith and to the church in my humble opinion. While I'm just a layperson and my knowledge in this area of theology is limited I'll share my thoughts. First I would just like to start out by saying this. It is my opinion that most mainstream evangelical churches do not present the reformed view of the doctrines of grace. So I am afraid that there are many many Christians who have never heard and have absolutely no notion of what the reformed soteriological view is. It is also my opinion that this is a very sad thing and that I grieve for my fellow brethren who are working out their salvation through works. For that is what I see arminism to be, a soteriological system that requires us "man" to co-operate with God in our salvation. While this might seem like a small and insignificant thing to most, I believe it is a very very important error that opens the door to several problems that the evangelical church faces today. So to me it is not a small thing. I believe that once someone truly embraces the doctrines of grace then you'll witness someone that is truly at peace with their saving faith. They are assured of their salvation and they understand justification by faith alone and they don't ever feel pressured to lead a life of works again. Unfortunately, election and predestination is the major stumbling block to many arminians. I have witnessed this over and over again and I'm saddened by the hold it has on the church. We can only pray that by Gods grace that there will be a neo-reformation in the church today. Y.B.I.C, Dave.
Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified. - Galatians 2:16
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,025 Likes: 274
Head Honcho
|
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,025 Likes: 274 |
doulos said: I've been pondering the way these two [election & perserverance] fit together . . . May I assume that you have difficulty understanding how election to salvation by God and the believer's persevering to the end are compatible? Perhaps if you shared what you perceive is a problem(s) we might be able to help you. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" /> In His Grace,
simul iustus et peccator
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 277
Enthusiast
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 277 |
Puritan wrote It is my opinion that most mainstream evangelical churches do not present the reformed view of the doctrines of grace. Layman or not you nailed that one. In fact, most of what I have learned about the Doctrines of Grace I have learned on my own and slowly. Much thanks to all here for your honest replies. P.S. What does soteriology mean? I can't find a good definition of it.
Last edited by doulos; Tue May 31, 2005 8:58 AM.
Josh "...the word of God is not bound."--2 Timothy 2:9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 277
Enthusiast
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 277 |
Pilgrim said: May I assume that you have difficulty understanding how election to salvation by God and the believer's persevering to the end are compatible? Perhaps if you shared what you perceive is a problem(s) we might be able to help you. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" /> No problem. It just occurred to me that the churches I listed have some issues with Perseverance most of the time and I thought it might be because they don't have a good grip on who's in charge of Salvation. More to the point, its not really their grip that matters, but they don't get it. Especially that bunch that has to be Saved on Sunday. Any little sin knocks them out of heaven, they think. Anyway, just thinking and praying and reading and trying to learn.
Josh "...the word of God is not bound."--2 Timothy 2:9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,025 Likes: 274
Head Honcho
|
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,025 Likes: 274 |
doulos said: P.S. What does soteriology mean? I can't find a good definition of it. soter= salvation ology=the science or study of[/i] Thus you have Soteriology: The study of the doctrine (teaching) of salvation. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />
simul iustus et peccator
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 216
Enthusiast
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 216 |
P.S. What does soteriology mean? I can't find a good definition of it. Good question doulos...Before I got my first Systematic I had NO clue what all these ologies were, and by the way I still don't. Which brings up another question that Pilgrim would be able to answer. Is there any possibility of going through a Sytematic here on The Highway at some point, like in the Faith of our Fathers forum?
tj "-that I may know Him and the power of His resurrection..."
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,060
Old Hand
|
Old Hand
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,060 |
That might be a fun thing to do! I'm "systematically" reading through Robert Reymond's Systematic on my own at the present time. JEdwards (Joe) recommended doing it that way and it has been very profitable.
Trust the past to God's mercy, the present to God's love and the future to God's providence." - St. Augustine Hiraeth
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,025 Likes: 274
Head Honcho
|
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,025 Likes: 274 |
thredj said: Is there any possibility of going through a Systematic here on The Highway at some point, like in the Faith of our Fathers forum? tj, Due to the size of most Systematic Theology texts and the depth to which many of the "classic" one's go into, never mind the quotes in Latin, Greek and Hebrew which many use <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/giggle.gif" alt="" /> it really wouldn't be feasible to use them as not a few people could feel that the material is beyond them. However, what might be considered is using either Louis Berkhof's Manual of Christian Doctrine or Summary of Christian Doctrine, both which have questions at the end of each chapter. There are a couple caveats however in using one of these books: First, there is the matter of possible copyright infringement if the full contents are reproduced in full. Secondly, there is the issue of the amount of material that each new section would have which would put a strain on the database and the amount of server space used. An alternative to this would be for those wishing to participate or follow along to purchase a copy of the selected book. Other suggestions would be entertained, of course. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" /> In His Grace,
simul iustus et peccator
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 216
Enthusiast
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 216 |
Pilgrim said: An alternative to this would be for those wishing to participate or follow along to purchase a copy of the selected book. I'd be open to doing this if others would be interested.
tj "-that I may know Him and the power of His resurrection..."
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 416
Addict
|
Addict
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 416 |
Just as Berkof's Systematic Theology is outstanding in its own field, his A Summary of Christian Doctrine is without equal as a popular handbook of Christian doctrine, written from a Reformed standpoint.
Louis Berkof died in 1957, at the age of 83, after a long and distinguished career as a teacher of theology at Calvin Theological Seminary, Grand Rapids, and having attained world-wide fame as an author.
Systematically arranged and helpfully sub-divided, A Summary of Christian Doctrine has proved ideal for study-groups. Passages for memorization and questions for review at the close of each chapter enhanc the book's value for the student. I carry a copy of this book with my Spirit of Reformation Study Bible. It's come in handy..... well..... almost every Sunday. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" /> I'de be willing to be apart of a study here. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" /> Dave.
Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified. - Galatians 2:16
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 193
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 193 |
Pilgrim An alternative to this would be for those wishing to participate or follow along to purchase a copy of the selected book. Sounds like a good idea to me. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/BigThumbUp.gif" alt="" />
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,856
Needs to get a Life
|
Needs to get a Life
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,856 |
Pilgrim said:
..... what might be considered is using either Louis Berkhof's Manual of Christian Doctrine or Summary of Christian Doctrine, both which have questions at the end of each chapter. That sounds like a good idea. My grandchildren are using the Summary of Christian Doctrine as one of the books they are learning from in their catechism class. I find it helpful myself. If all those who are interested in participating in a study of this material purchase a copy of this book I'm sure we could have meaningful discussions using this book. Wes
When I survey the wondrous cross on which the Prince of Glory died, my richest gain I count but loss and pour contempt on all my pride. - Isaac Watts
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,856
Needs to get a Life
|
Needs to get a Life
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,856 |
Puritan said:
I carry a copy of this book with my Spirit of Reformation Study Bible. It's come in handy..... well..... almost every Sunday. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" /> I'de be willing to be apart of a study here. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />
Dave. Dave you've got a lot of material in the back of the Spirit of the Reformation Study Bible already with the Heidelberg Catechism and the Westminster Standards. By also carrying the Summary of Christian Doctrine you should be ready to defend the Reformed faith whether you go. Wes
When I survey the wondrous cross on which the Prince of Glory died, my richest gain I count but loss and pour contempt on all my pride. - Isaac Watts
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,025 Likes: 274
Head Honcho
|
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,025 Likes: 274 |
There is another option which I am planning on pursuing on Monday, D.v. Berkhof's Summary of Christian Doctrine is currently online by special and temporary permission from Eerdmans Publishing. So, I will try and call them and see if we can also get permission to put the book online for the purpose of the proposed study. If this pans out, then no one will have to buy the book. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/bigglasses.gif" alt="" />
I'll reply back when/if I get an answer.
simul iustus et peccator
|
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
636
guests, and
28
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|