Posts: 15,025
Joined: April 2001
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,348
Posts56,544
Members992
| |
Most Online2,383 Jan 12th, 2026
|
|
|
#35483
Fri Feb 23, 2007 7:30 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 379
Enthusiast
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 379 |
The mercy of God is necessary not only when a person repents, but even to lead him to repent, Augustine
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 379
Enthusiast
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 379 |
So essentially - Humanism and Calvinism are complete polar opposites. Not that we don't know this already, but it's interesting to see an Athiest confirm this - basically in order to be a "true" Christian you gotta be Reformed! Everything else inches closer to Humanism. Atheism <----------------------------------------> Calvinism So, where does Christianity stand today? Currently, those who openly advocate the doctrine that salvation comes only as a free gift, regardless of what you as a person do or believe, are much fewer in number than they used to be. They are much more common among Protestants, especially conservative, fundamentalist, and evangelical denominations. Some, like Calvinists and Reformed Theologians, continue to advocate the extreme predestination first hinted at in Augustine.
It is, however, important to remember that strains of this run strong through all forms of traditional, orthodox Christianity even if it remains unstated or undeveloped. If you ask a Christian if they really think that it is theoretically possible for a human to always choose to do good without the added assistance of their God's grace, you are very unlikely to get a positive response.
It is this which a progressive humanism not only rejects as a productive outlook but also opposes as an ultimately harmful ideology - much like Pelagius did almost sixteen centuries ago. Pelagius may not have been a humanist in the modern sense, but it is clear that he placed the welfare and actions of human beings much more to the center of his concerns than did Augustine and other church leaders. We, like Pelagius, must reject any sort of god which would make unfulfillable demands from human beings. We must also reject any idea that humans are inherently and irrevocably corrupt. It is certainly unlikely that anyone will ever manage to live a perfect life, but we should hold out the possibility and use that as a goal to strive for.
Pelagius may have been condemned and persecuted for his views, but they never entirely died. The idea that we can choose to do what is right is an essential part of humanism and could have been an essential part of Christianity. Their loss is our gain.
Last edited by AJC; Fri Feb 23, 2007 10:05 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 591
Addict
|
Addict
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 591 |
It is certainly unlikely that anyone will ever manage to live a perfect life, but we should hold out the possibility and use that as a goal to strive for. AJC, this is a very interesting thought from the quoted atheist. As Christians, we have news for this unbeliever. Such a person did live a perfect life and we crucified Him for His trouble. This reminds me of another quote from Calvin's Institutes: The reasoning of the philosophers is excellent, except that God's revelation of the changed or corrupted nature of man is withheld from them. Denny Romans 3:22-24
Denny
Simon Peter answered Him, "Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life." [John 6:68]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 379
Enthusiast
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 379 |
Also, I don't think the guy realizes the difference between natural good and spiritual good.
SIn in all forms - including thoughts - are extremely damaging, regardless of how we treat others (i.e. the golden rule.)
The mercy of God is necessary not only when a person repents, but even to lead him to repent, Augustine
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,025 Likes: 274
Head Honcho
|
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,025 Likes: 274 |
Denny, It's interesting that I too picked up on that same statement at the end of the article: It is certainly unlikely that anyone will ever manage to live a perfect life, but we should hold out the possibility and use that as a goal to strive for.
However, I looked at it from another perspective; an apologetic one. Being an adherent of "Presuppositional (biblical) Apologetics" one should first use the opponent's own views against him/her by showing them to be in error, illogical, irrational, etc. and THEN bring them to a true starting point and move on from there. So, in this case, this man does what is typical of most everyone.... he "borrows" ideas and/or truths from Christianity to argue in his behalf while disparaging Christianity as being mythology, counter-productive to society, ad nauseam. The item he "borrows" is the element of "Ethics" and/or a standard of "Morality". If the God of the Bible does not exist, then such phrases as "perfect life" have absolutely no meaning. For what is "perfection" without an absolute standard of what is the highest good? And if there is no God, then anything defined as "good" will vary with what each individual thinks is good, which is exactly what all societies do. Nazi Germany believed that perfection was the Arian race and everything and everyone else was "imperfect", thus to achieve perfection in the world it was necessary to purge it of those who were not of the Arian race. Now, without an ultimate standard of truth and moral perfection (righteousness) which can only be found in the one true God, no one really has a valid argument or even a right to criticize what Hitler's Germany believed and did from the standpoint of ethics. Okay.... I'm rambling, but hopefully you get the point... without God there is no "perfection" and thus if you reject God then there is no "right" or "wrong" and thus nothing to strive for other than what any particular society values as being desirable, aka: politically correct. Oh yeh... I almost forgot I wanted to say that I got a genuine chuckle reading the part where he accredits evangelicals as being the ones who hold to this Augustinian extremist view of the depravity of man and his utter dependence upon a God who insists that all men do what they are incapable or doing.... or even desiring to do for that matter. IF only that were true, eh?  In His grace,
simul iustus et peccator
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,893 Likes: 48
Needs to get a Life
|
Needs to get a Life
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,893 Likes: 48 |
Pilgrim said: Oh yeh... I almost forgot I wanted to say that I got a genuine chuckle reading the part where he accredits evangelicals as being the ones who hold to this Augustinian extremist view of the depravity of man and his utter dependence upon a God who insists that all men do what they are incapable or doing.... or even desiring to do for that matter. IF only that were true, eh? I did too, but then again who are the real evangelicals?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 379
Enthusiast
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 379 |
Some, like Calvinists and Reformed Theologians, continue to advocate the extreme predestination first hinted at in Augustine. Yes, we are quite the extremists <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/laugh.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/takethat.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/thewave.gif" alt="" />
The mercy of God is necessary not only when a person repents, but even to lead him to repent, Augustine
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 14
Plebeian
|
Plebeian
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 14 |
Hello all, First post here! Greeting! The above reminds me of a Thomas Watson quote, 'till a man places his faith in Christ, his best deeds are but glorious sins!'
|
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
512
guests, and
48
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|