Forum Search
Member Spotlight
Tom
Tom
Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 4,892
Joined: April 2001
Forum Statistics
Forums31
Topics8,347
Posts56,542
Members992
Most Online2,383
Jan 12th, 2026
Top Posters
Pilgrim 15,023
Tom 4,892
chestnutmare 3,463
J_Edwards 2,615
John_C 1,904
Wes 1,856
RJ_ 1,583
MarieP 1,579
Robin 1,079
Top Posters(30 Days)
Pilgrim 35
Tom 3
Robin 1
Recent Posts
"Marvellous lovingkindness."
by Pilgrim - Wed May 20, 2026 9:09 AM
King of Kings
by Anthony C. - Mon May 18, 2026 2:22 PM
"So to walk even as He walked."
by Pilgrim - Sun May 17, 2026 6:42 AM
"Who giveth us richly all things to enjoy."
by Pilgrim - Sat May 16, 2026 5:18 AM
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 2 1 2
xyz #39759 Wed Jun 11, 2008 2:30 PM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,024
Likes: 274
Head Honcho
Offline
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,024
Likes: 274
Quote
xyz said:
That uniqueness is not stated in Scripture. No doubt the SBC theologian is as aware of that verse as any.
IF that uniqueness is not stated in Scripture, then are YOU saying the Father and the Spirit suffered the penalty for those whom Christ died for? That all 3 persons of the Godhead died, were buried and rose from the dead, thus effecting salvation for the elect? <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/scratchchin.gif" alt="" />

The author may be aware of the text, but that is no guarantee that he has understood it correctly. Most all heresy is based upon an erroneous interpretation and/or application of a biblical passage.

In His grace,


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]
Pilgrim #39760 Wed Jun 11, 2008 2:59 PM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 70
xyz Offline
Journeyman
Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 70
Quote
Pilgrim said:
Quote
xyz said:
That uniqueness is not stated in Scripture. No doubt the SBC theologian is as aware of that verse as any.
Quote
IF that uniqueness is not stated in Scripture, then are YOU saying the Father and the Spirit suffered the penalty for those whom Christ died for?
That may be what the theologian is saying.

Quote
That all 3 persons of the Godhead died, were buried and rose from the dead, thus effecting salvation for the elect?
That probably isn't. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />

xyz #39761 Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:25 PM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,024
Likes: 274
Head Honcho
Offline
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,024
Likes: 274
IF this author is saying the Father and the Spirit suffered the penalty for those whom Christ died, then his doctrine of the Trinity is heterodox at best and heretical at worst. Either way, it is contrary to historic biblical Christianity.

Since this book raises such questions, why would anyone bother with it? <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/shrug.gif" alt="" />

As far as Mohler's and Challies' criticism of the book, I would personally trust their judgment over those who would accuse their assessment as inaccurate.

[Linked Image] There are soooooo many sound, conservative and biblical writings available today, why spend one's limited time with this type of dribble? <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/igiveup.gif" alt="" />

In His grace,


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]
Pilgrim #39762 Wed Jun 11, 2008 5:12 PM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 38
Newbie
Offline
Newbie
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 38
I say Amen to that, Pilgrim. Much Ado about a book that is clearly off track. The very idea that the Trinity all bear the nail marks, would be enough for me to toss it

Pilgrim #39763 Wed Jun 11, 2008 6:23 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 193
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 193
Quote
Pilgrim said:
IF this author is saying the Father and the Spirit suffered the penalty for those whom Christ died, then his doctrine of the Trinity is heterodox at best and heretical at worst. Either way, it is contrary to historic biblical Christianity.

Since this book raises such questions, why would anyone bother with it?

As far as Mohler's and Challies' criticism of the book, I would personally trust their judgment over those who would accuse their assessment as inaccurate.

There are soooooo many sound, conservative and biblical writings available today, why spend one's limited time with this type of dribble?

My very thoughts exactly <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/applause.gif" alt="" /> -- especially the last paragraph. I do hope that no one (especially Tom) interpreted my words in defense of the historic, orthodox understanding of perichoresis or circumincession as an endorsement of what I imagine are the heterodox or heretical doctrines behind The Shack. I too would generally trust Al Mohler on a matter like this, especially since it's just not the type of book I'd ever make time to read myself.


[Linked Image]
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 340 guests, and 33 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Bosco, Mike, Puritan Steve, NSH123, Church44
992 Registered Users
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
May
S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31
Today's Birthdays
There are no members with birthdays on this day.
Popular Topics(Views)
1,877,034 Gospel truth