Forum Search
Member Spotlight
Pilgrim
Pilgrim
NH, USA
Posts: 15,025
Joined: April 2001
Forum Statistics
Forums31
Topics8,348
Posts56,543
Members992
Most Online2,383
Jan 12th, 2026
Top Posters
Pilgrim 15,025
Tom 4,892
chestnutmare 3,463
J_Edwards 2,615
John_C 1,904
Wes 1,856
RJ_ 1,583
MarieP 1,579
Robin 1,079
Top Posters(30 Days)
Pilgrim 35
Tom 3
Robin 1
Recent Posts
King of Kings
by Tom - Thu May 21, 2026 4:31 PM
"If so be ye have tasted that the Lord is gracious."
by Pilgrim - Thu May 21, 2026 5:30 AM
"Marvellous lovingkindness."
by Pilgrim - Wed May 20, 2026 9:09 AM
"So to walk even as He walked."
by Pilgrim - Sun May 17, 2026 6:42 AM
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Hop To
#40827 Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:04 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 710
William Offline OP
Addict
OP Offline
Addict
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 710
Statement of faith of a church that supposedly believes in the doctrines of grace.

Quote
Free will vs God's sovereignty

Man is by nature an enemy of God; spiritually dead in his sin (Colossians 2:13; Ephesians 2:1-3; Romans 8:7-8). His will is so enslaved to sin, he cannot even understand, nor spiritually discern, the things of God (I Corinthians 2:14). Therefore, man’s only hope for redemption rests solely on the unmerited grace of a merciful God (Ephesians 1:7; 2:8-10). Those redeemed through faith in the atoning death of Christ on the cross (when He experienced God’s wrath, satisfying His holy justice as punishment for the sin of all who would believe; I John 4:10) are called God’s chosen or elect, because salvation is the gift of God’s sovereign and amazing grace, not the result of the best efforts or works of a spiritually dead man (Romans 8:28-33; 9:11-13, 16; 11:5-6; Col. 3:12; I Peter 1:1-2; 2:8-9; Hebrews 12:2).

Quote
MaryP, said:

"satisfying His holy justice as punishment for the sin of all who would believe"

William, you are not disagreeing with that statement, right? The way you said it, it sounded like it was something else you had a problem with, but I trust you don't.

Mary, first off I apologize for never having responded to your question.

To answer, I would say that alone and by itself there is nothing wrong with the statement.

-BUT-

I wonder why was it added in the first place and although I don't know the the hearts of those who wrote the statement my suspicion is that it is to make their statement more palatable (agreeable or pleasant). So lets remove this (when He experienced God’s wrath, satisfying His holy justice as punishment for the sin of all who would believe; I John 4:10) and see what we get.

Quote
Free will vs God's sovereignty
Man is by nature an enemy of God; spiritually dead in his sin (Colossians 2:13; Ephesians 2:1-3; Romans 8:7-8). His will is so enslaved to sin, he cannot even understand, nor spiritually discern, the things of God (I Corinthians 2:14). Therefore, man’s only hope for redemption rests solely on the unmerited grace of a merciful God (Ephesians 1:7; 2:8-10). Those redeemed through faith in the atoning death of Christ on the cross are called God’s chosen or elect, because salvation is the gift of God’s sovereign and amazing grace, not the result of the best efforts or works of a spiritually dead man (Romans 8:28-33; 9:11-13, 16; 11:5-6; Col. 3:12; I Peter 1:1-2; 2:8-9; Hebrews 12:2).

Now isn't that better? <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/giggle.gif" alt="" /> The Canon's of Dord't delt with this slippery snake (if indeed that is what it is) of Arminianism concerning the foreknowledge of God in the "FIRST HEAD OF DOCTRINE Of Divine Predestination" and the rejection of errors.


The true doctrine concerning Election and Reprobation having been explained, the Synod rejects the errors of those:

I. Who teach: That the will of God to save those who would believe and would persevere in faith and in the obedience of faith, is the whole and entire decree of election unto salvation, and that nothing else concerning this decree has been revealed in God's Word.

For these deceive the simple and plainly contradict the Scriptures, which declare that God will not only save those who will believe, but that he has also from eternity chosen certain particular persons to whom above others he in time will grant both faith in Christ and perseverance; as it written: "I manifested thy name unto the men whom thou gavest me out of the world," John 17:6."And as many as were ordained to eternal life believed," Acts 13:48.And: "Even as he chose us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blemish before him in love," Ephesians 1:4.




Hope you have (had) a good Thanksgiving,
William

William #40828 Wed Nov 26, 2008 9:57 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 710
William Offline OP
Addict
OP Offline
Addict
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 710
Look at article 1 of "The Five Articles of Remonstrance" alone and by itself is a good statement and is not contrary to the holy scriptures.

Quote
Article I - That God, by an eternal, unchangeable purpose in Jesus Christ, his Son, before the foundation of the world, hath determined, out of the fallen, sinful race of men, to save in Christ, for Christ's sake, and through Christ, those who, through the grace of the Holy Ghost, shall believe on this his Son Jesus, and shall persevere in this faith and obedience of faith, through this grace, even to the end; and, on the other hand, to leave the incorrigible and unbelieving in sin and under wrath, and to condemn them as alienate from Christ, according to the word of the Gospel in John iii. 36: "He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life; and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him," and according to other passages of Scripture also.

-BUT-

The Remonstrance held the position that the decree to save is found in the foreknowledge of God.

William #40829 Wed Nov 26, 2008 10:00 PM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,025
Likes: 274
Head Honcho
Offline
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,025
Likes: 274
William,

I too have a serious problem with how they stated things:

Quote
Those redeemed through faith in the atoning death of Christ on the cross (when He experienced God’s wrath, satisfying His holy justice as punishment for the sin of all who would believe; I John 4:10) <span style="background-color:yellow">are called God’s chosen or elect</span>, because salvation is the gift of God’s sovereign and amazing grace, not the result of the best efforts or works of a spiritually dead man (Romans 8:28-33; 9:11-13, 16; 11:5-6; Col. 3:12; I Peter 1:1-2; 2:8-9; Hebrews 12:2).
Giving the author(s) the benefit of the doubt, I would have to say that this is poorly worded. Why? Because it can be taken in at least two different ways; perhaps more.

1) Those believing ones for whom Christ died "are called (known as) God's chosen or elect", which would put the choosing or electing prior to the believing. This is the biblical teaching since God's election is from eternity.

2) Those believing ones for whom Christ died are (consequently, i.e., subsequent to their believing), called God's chosen or elect. This is not biblically supported and that which is believed among non-Reformed (Pelagian, semi-Pelagian and Arminian) groups.

That's my [Linked Image]


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]
William #40830 Wed Nov 26, 2008 10:10 PM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,025
Likes: 274
Head Honcho
Offline
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,025
Likes: 274
Quote
William said:
The Remonstrance held the position that the decree to save is found in the foreknowledge of God.
And that was due to the fact that they redefined the word "foreknowledge" to mean simple prescience (knowledge of raw facts), which they alleged came to be known by God AFTER He peered down the annals of (pre) history and saw who it was that believed. Thus, they denied the doctrine of PREdestination and formulated their own doctrine which in essence is POSTdestination. Such a position denied the very deity of God since it impugns God's Omniscience, since there was something He did not know. It also impugns God's Omnipresence, since He had to peer into this alleged "history" (those acts of men) which He Himself did not create, He having no prior knowledge of them or their acts. And lastly, this view impugns God's Omnipotence since His decree, determination, or (pre)destining of men was not a self-determined act but one which was totally dependent upon the alleged acts of those who didn't even exist. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/dizzy.gif" alt="" />

What a convoluted view this was.... NO WAIT!! What a convoluted view this is, since it is preached, taught and believed by the vast majority of Evangelicals today. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/wow1.gif" alt="" />


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 178 guests, and 41 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Bosco, Mike, Puritan Steve, NSH123, Church44
992 Registered Users
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
May
S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31
Today's Birthdays
There are no members with birthdays on this day.
Popular Topics(Views)
1,878,101 Gospel truth