|
Posts: 146
Joined: August 2021
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,348
Posts56,543
Members992
| |
Most Online2,383
Jan 12th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,892 Likes: 48
Needs to get a Life
|
Needs to get a Life
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,892 Likes: 48 |
That does not answer the question. I did not see anything offensive in the comments. Tom
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2026
Posts: 13
Plebeian
|
|
Plebeian
Joined: Jan 2026
Posts: 13 |
So calling for the death of Christian brothers is no longer offensive. Ok. You people have a sick game going on here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,025 Likes: 274
Head Honcho
|
|
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,025 Likes: 274 |
So calling for the death of Christian brothers is no longer offensive. Ok. You people have a sick game going on here. Please supply the quote and person who allegedly called for the 'death of Christian brothers'??
![[Linked Image]](http://www.the-highway.com/pilgrim/pil_sig2.gif) simul iustus et peccator![[Linked Image]](http://www.the-highway.com/Smileys/pencil.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2026
Posts: 13
Plebeian
|
|
Plebeian
Joined: Jan 2026
Posts: 13 |
I already did. It was you. But you know that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,025 Likes: 274
Head Honcho
|
|
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,025 Likes: 274 |
I already did. It was you. But you know that. PROVIDE THE QUOTE!! 
simul iustus et peccator
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2026
Posts: 13
Plebeian
|
|
Plebeian
Joined: Jan 2026
Posts: 13 |
PILGRIM: "Dispies have a "recalibration clause" in their system to accommodate the ever-fluxing news of the day. However, I can't help but recall the following:
^^^ Here you call out by name Dispensationalists in general (and those who follow the system of Dispensationalism, which are Dispensationalists).
PILGRIM: "Deuteronomy 18:20-22 (ASV) 20 But the prophet, that shall speak a word presumptuously in my name, which I have not commanded him to speak, or that shall speak in the name of other gods, that same prophet shall die..."
^^^ Here you quote Deuteronomy 18:20 to justify what should happen to Dispensationalists.
Now your argument may be (considering the context of this thread), that Dispensationalists are not Christians, therefore you are not calling for the death of Christians, but are quoting Deuteronomy 18:20 to justify the death of non-Christians.
But why are you trolling in the first place? Just own it. These are your words.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,025 Likes: 274
Head Honcho
|
|
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,025 Likes: 274 |
PILGRIM: "Deuteronomy 18:20-22 (ASV) 20 But the prophet, that shall speak a word presumptuously in my name, which I have not commanded him to speak, or that shall speak in the name of other gods, that same prophet shall die..."
^^^ Here you quote Deuteronomy 18:20 to justify what should happen to Dispensationalists. This is a classic example of a "Non Sequitur" (a conclusion or statement that does not logically follow from the previous argument or statement.) The CONTEXT is that anyone who takes it upon himself to predict an event concerning God's eternal will/plan and that event/matter does not come to pass is thus, by God's infallible Word, a 'false prophet', and thus in OT Israel politic that individual is to be put to death. Therefore, concerning some within the Dispensational camp who are given to making predictions and fulfillments of future events which are patently false, under OT law, they would be liable to being stoned to death. In our present NT covenant, that law no longer pertains, unless one is an advocate of Theonomic Reconstructionism to its extreme. You, at best, have over reacted to my statement which is patently true concerning false prophets and which pertains to ANYONE who is guilty of that law. If one holds to some form of Dispensationalism and makes false predictions, claiming that it is God's truth, then they are worthy of being excommunicated from their local assembly, IF in fact they actually are a professing member of a church, and totally avoided by all who profess the name of Christ. So, the question is, are you one of those who is given to making false prophetic announcements based upon your particular and unique interpretation of Scripture and announces such nonsense publicly in essence as "Thus saith the Lord...."? IF <---- that is the case, then I strongly urge you to repent and seek the Lord for forgiveness. IF <---- you are not such an individual, then at least I would encourage you to curb your tender sensibilities, read what others are writing/saying in CONTEXT and first look to yourself for any possible misunderstanding before openly and publicly castigating anyone harshly thus being guilty of breaking the 9th commandment.
simul iustus et peccator
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2026
Posts: 13
Plebeian
|
|
Plebeian
Joined: Jan 2026
Posts: 13 |
So instead of apologizing, repenting, and asking for forgiveness; you justify your wickedness and shift blame to me.
is it not evil? offer it now unto thy governor; will he be pleased with thee, or accept thy person? saith the LORD of hosts." (Malachi1:8b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,892 Likes: 48
Needs to get a Life
|
|
Needs to get a Life
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,892 Likes: 48 |
Wow!
Pilgrim has been more than clear in his message to you. He has nothing to apologize for.
He asked you a question and you chose not to answer it.
Tom
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2025
Posts: 117 Likes: 4
Certified Flunky
|
|
OP
Certified Flunky
Joined: Jul 2025
Posts: 117 Likes: 4 |
Since you requested, I'll be happy to help you analyze the unchristian behavior in this thread. I'll start with the 6th comment...
Instead of guys, it's spelled guise. An outward appearance that conceals the true nature of someone or something. Indicating that Dispensationalists are not what they appear to be, ie. Christian. They are wearing a costume (maybe a wolf in sheep's clothing). Other synonyms for guise are: pretense, act, facade.
If you would like to say: "he said "those" indicating only the ones in the videos" --- ok, let's see if that matches with the following comments:
You say: "Dispies" --- This is a generalization of the group as a whole, not a specific subset within Dispensationalism. If that's not specific enough, then you say: "in their system" --- so this further illustrates that you are speaking of the system as a whole group and not only those within the subset. Then you go on to quote Scripture that these people should be killed (Deut 18:20).
You then state: "the ever-fluxing news of the day." --- as though the Scriptures are not the basis of Dispensational Premillennialism.
Strictly tongue and cheek: But then goes onto to mock Dispensationalists and their love for the soon appearing of Christ. Tongue and cheek just means: I'm about to mock/belittle you, but I'll pretend it's just harmless joking so I can get away with it, while trying to dodge responsibility if the target gets upset.
Then you say: "I'm confused" when you really are not confused. We both know this is passive-aggressive communication (or just straight-up condescending sarcasm). You know from my posts that I'm a Dispensationalists. So stop the pretense.
You say: "Sorry, but evidently I'm deaf" --- This is obvious. You cannot hear the words coming out of your own mouth. You said, I just agreed with you.
Then you say: "explain yourself." --- Why? So you can play the victim when I read your own words back to you. You (and your dispie bashing cronies) are playing a sick game that is not in any way befitting for a Christian, nor the name of Christ.
I thought I was joining a Christian forum. But unfortunately, all I ended up with is a mocking, belittling and Dispensational bashing forum that is passive-aggressive.
Please, go ahead and play the victim.
Maranatha!! Let me start off by saying apologies for my part in this confusion. I know this member is now banned, but when I wrote "guise" in lieu of guys, there was no malice intended. I routinely type guys as guise, and that is also on other forums that are sports related. I meant no harm. 
“The foundation of knowledge is God’s revelation.” Dr. Greg Bahnsen
“In the New Testament the Lord Jesus Christ appears in order to fulfill the Old Testament hope of the Messiah. He presents himself as the king who has come to establish his kingdom in anticipation of his universal rule.” Dr. Kenneth Gentry
“Men must be governed by God or they will be ruled by tyrants.” William Penn
|
|
1 member likes this:
Robin |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,892 Likes: 48
Needs to get a Life
|
|
Needs to get a Life
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,892 Likes: 48 |
As I was thinking about this particular thread.
It is pretty clear that those who posted, were talking about Dispis, who date set.
Warpedwarrior is no longer on this forum. However, he (to state the obvious) took this as a slight against all Dispensationists.
I could understand if he was guilty of things like date setting. Which makes me wonder, if that is the case?
I have some Dispi friends, that I doubt would be offended at things said in this thread.
In fact, I have heard some of them equally go against those who date set.
Perhaps I did not need to make this post. But it is my way of thinking through what I read on the thread.
Obviously, I have my problems with Dispensationalism, but…
Tom
|
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
567
guests, and
52
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|
