<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr>[color:"blue"]Presbyterian pastors have the spiritual well-being of their entire flock (however small) as their chief concern. Baptists pastors tend only to adult sheep and leave the lambs to fend for themselves . In fact they dont recognise lambs as sheep at all .</font><hr></blockquote><p><br><br>(Fred) Good grief. I have never encountered such stunningly ignorant bigotry. It would be outrageous if it weren't so pitiful. This is the kind of attitude my racist uncle had toward blacks, except in this case, it is theological "racism." Geesh. How do you even counter something like this? [img]http://www.the-highway.com/w3timages/icons/frustrated.gif" alt="frustrated" title="frustrated[/img]<br><br>Fred
"Ah, sitting - the great leveler of men. From the mightest of pharaohs to the lowest of peasants, who doesn't enjoy a good sit?" M. Burns
In reply to:Geesh. How do you even counter something like this?
Fred,
You don't! Such individuals are living according to the world, the flesh and the devil and thus words of wisdom which are found in the Word of God have no effect when there is no spiritual life. However, all that is required of us is to point out to such individuals, particularly those who make a profession of faith, that such behaviour is not of God and it demands repentance. One of the true marks of Christ's sheep is that they will love the brethren. Of course, Howard in all probability doesn't think that Spurgeon was a "brother in Christ", and thus he perhaps thinks he is warranted to cast such pejorative statements at the man as well as all Baptists.
I almost feel the need to apologize for Howard as I am no doubt just as offended and shocked by what he wrote as you are. I do hope you understand that Howard does NOT speak for the Board, it's Staff nor for any of its members, but he speaks only for himself.
In reply to:I look upon baptists as brothers/sisters in Christ . Little brothers and sisters.
So you look, more or less, down upon us because we are not like you? I don't take offense at things often or very easily, but I have to say that it bugs the excrement out of me when people are closed-minded like that. I get frustrated with some of the elder people in my church who think Baptists are going to be the only ones in heaven, and your attitude doesn't seem much different than their's...although maybe not to the same extreme. No offense is intended though by my post.
As far as baby dedications are concerned, I have seen a couple of them at the church I used to attend before taking the youth minister job I am at now. Frankly, I never understood what the point was. All they did was have the moms come to the front of the church, stand in a line across the front of the sanctuary, hold their babies, and then the church prayed for the families. I didn't think it was all bad but I didn't understand why they called it a dedication if they really didn't dedicate anything .
At first I was so enraged, but then I realized you must just be speaking in ignorance, for someone who had any knowledge at all of Spurgeon and his orphanages among all the others things that were dear to his heart, would say such horrible things for one for whom Christ left the glories of heaven to shed His precious blood.
I would like to give you the benefit of the doubt and think maybe you were having dizzy spells when you wrote such trash.
And how dare you say that Baptist pastors leave the lambs to fend for themselves. I was saved at 9 years old in a baptist church. I was living in a shelter home and this baptist preacher found out about us and came every week to pick us up for church. This "no good" shepherd is what God used to bring me to Himself.
Howard what is wrong with you. Have you examined your own heart for grace? The reason I ask is that I see more times than not that you are lacking in the same grace that leaves heaven to visit sinful man. Why do you seem so self righteous about what you know? Do you think there is something in you that makes you better than Spurgeon, just because you believe in paedobaptism? Do you realize that you have anything that you have not received? It is this attitude that God makes sure none of us has all the truth, as we in our wicked hearts, would then hold it over the heads of others.
And dear Howard, if you think,as you said, Presbyterian pastors (while true there are many I am sure)have the spiritual well-being of their entire flock as their chief concern, what world are you living in? That statement itself shows how bigoted you really are.
"Love the brethren that agrees with ME " Hmmmmm........maybe, but "love the brethren" ? No chance.
Howard<br>I think you are trying to make Pilgrim look like he is being defensive, when in fact you fail to acknowledge that your questions are nothing but mere slanderous comments. Please, if you think that you are right, be man enough not to then make excuses when someone calls you on it.<br>
You didn't offend me at all. I just wasn't sure I understood what you were saying. This is not always the best mode of communication, as sometimes we are thinking faster than we type.<br><br>No offense taken, but I do have difficulty with people(not you in particular) who seen to be so proud of what God has been so gracious to teach them. Not only do I get weary of my sins, but my self righteousness as well.<br>I know for myself that I was called out as a child and that even all those years in the Reformed Baptist would not have in any way considered myself Arminian. The truth is, we are all still growing, well most of us are, and I pray continue to learn until school is out, and we go home.<br><br>Grace<br>Linda
In reply to -"in all probability howard doesn't think that Spurgeon was a brother in Christ" .<br><br>Please read my posts more carefully and you would not say such nonsense .<br><br>howard
Howard<br><br>I have read what Pilgrim had to say and I find no warrant to your saying that he was belittling ALL Presbyterian pastors.<br>The fact is Pilgrim is a Presbyterian himself and you may not realize this but I have heard more Presbyterian call Spurgeon "The Prince of Preachers" than I have Reformed Baptists.<br>Howard you have placed such a high priority on baby baptism that you have let it cloud your mind.<br>Yes I have seen this before, in both Baptist and Presbyterian camps, but since it isn't a salvation issue (unless you believe in 'baptismal regeneration'), one may debate the issue, but it shouldn't divide.<br><br>Tom
Howard<br>I think your attitude is what is so offending. You come across almost bitter.<br><br>What exactly do you think "the baptism of lambs" does? I did not have my own children baptized based on my knowledge then, however you cannot tell me my children were not covenant children. In God's providence, it was now before He was pleased to teach me covenant theology, but that does not make me less His(or of course then we would be speaking of works and not grace) nor does that make my no more in need of a Saviour.<br><br>Neglect is a very big word, and maybe one day when we become spirits of just men made perfect, we can talk to him and find out what he knows now.<br><br>Linda<br><br>
In reply to:If you read Pilgrims post carefully you will see him belittle ALL Presbyterian pastors.
Perhaps it is YOU, Howard, that should read my post carefully as you will NOT find a summary belittling of ALL Presbyterian pastors anywhere. But, I am curious, Howard, whether you think that Presbyterian pastors above reproach just because they baptize infants?
Secondly, I personally do not recognize ANY infant as a "lamb", as that connotes that they are washed in the blood of Christ, justified and adopted as children of God, adopted into His kingdom. Baptized infants of believers are incorporated into an external covenantal relationship. Only those who are regenerated by the Holy Spirit own an internal relationship to the covenant of grace. I cannot and will not presume the salvation of anyone who hasn't confessed Christ.
In reply to:I dont know why some are so tetchy about it.
It isn't the doctrinal issue that irritates some of us. Rather, it is your bigotry, lack of charity and love of the brethren who differ with your views which are not fundamental to the faith that we find most objectionable. I and others have brought this to your attention countless times, but our admonitions, corrections and rebukes have fallen upon "deaf ears". Our attempts to guide you to a biblical position are warranted. Your bigotry and constant summary castigations and character assassinations of people are not.
In reply to:[color:"blue"]Pastors look after their flock which includes the baptism of "lambs".
Spurgeon never did this did he ? Then he neglected a great part of the flock .
Which is more important: to baptise them and hope they come to a saving knowledge of the truth or raise them up in such a way where they are taught what the truth is so that they don't think they are somehow saved because some water was poured on them?
In reply to:[color:"blue"]I look upon baptists as brothers/sisters in Christ . Little brothers and sisters .
Men like Spurgeon are clearly your "bigger" brothers in Christ, Howard. This discussion and others indicates that you need to learn to better exercise charity.
1 Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal. 2 And though I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries, and all knowledge; and though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not charity, I am nothing. 3 And though I bestow all my goods to feed the poor, and though I give my body to be burned, and have not charity, it profiteth me nothing. 4 Charity suffereth long, and is kind; charity envieth not; charity vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up, 5 Doth not behave itself unseemly, seeketh not her own, is not easily provoked, thinketh no evil; 6 Rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth in the truth; 7 Beareth all things, believeth all things, hopeth all things, endureth all things. 8 Charity never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail; whether there be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away. 9 For we know in part, and we prophesy in part. 10 But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away. 11 When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things. 12 For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known. 13 And now abideth faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity. (I Cor. 13.)
Kyle
I tell you, this man went down to his house justified.
<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr>[color:"blue"]Which is more important: to baptise them and hope they come to a saving knowledge of the truth or raise them up in such a way where they are taught what the truth is so that they don't think they are somehow saved because some water was poured on them?</font><hr></blockquote><p>My view is that you do both: baptize them as those who have been granted immeasurable privileges as covenant children (externally) AND teach them of their great need of Christ. Upon repentance and faith, they it could be said of them: "Hebrews 12:22-24 (ASV) ". . . ye are come unto mount Zion, and unto the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to innumerable hosts of angels, to the general assembly and church of the firstborn who are enrolled in heaven, and to God the Judge of all, and to the spirits of just men made perfect, and to Jesus the mediator of a new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling that speaketh better than [that of] Abel." [img]http://www.the-highway.com/w3timages/icons/grin.gif" alt="grin" title="grin[/img]<br><br>In His Grace,
Tom, you are right there I believe. My wife agrees with you about the baptism issue clouding my mind. I've been on it for about 18 months to the expense of all else. Thanks.<br><br>howard