"lala land" isn't a place I care to venture

...glad we agree


So, Pilgrim, are we looking here at a literal corpse

here reffers to Isaiah 26 and 66.


When the Lord returns, that dead body, aka: corpse, most likely will have returned to the earth having decomposed to its basic elements, will be resurrected by the command of the Lord and transformed into a spiritual body which is meet for dwelling on the New Earth.

Thus, you say that dead body = corpse = basic elements

So, what ever happens to dead body, happens to the corpse, happens to the basic elements (making up a corpse). Such, if God was to raise the dead body, He raises a corpse, and thus by default He raises the elements making up a corpse (because a corpse w/ out thoes elements is not that corpse anymore). So what happens to the elements of one corpse which 2k years ago were part of another corpse? A corpse w/ out its same physical components (periodic table of elements) is not a corpse. Just like in justification, when my spirit recived resurection, He took my spirit operated on it and thus it is a different spririt then the old (same in kind different in substence). Same thing will be with our body when it recieves its promise of resurection, it will be same in kind but different in substence. The corpse is the substence of our old body as it is now; it is the demonstration of the ultimate curse or sin here.

Pilgrim asked:

Now, I have asked you previously, what is it, if not this same body/corpse, that will be resurrected on that great day when the Lord returns


Pilgrim anwsered:

It is at this time that the incomplete person, having been separated from its earthly body, is given a body spiritual/incorruptible, which apparently will be similar in outward appearance to the earthly/corruptible body...



...therefore a corpse,

...decomposed to its basic elements...

proven to be corruptable cannot be that body which is given to us.


...It may be that we are arguing same thing from different perspectives here...

A lumber-jack bought an axe. Since then he used that axe for 20 years, he changed the handle many times and he changed the head many times. Is it still the same axe he bought 20 years ago?

I would say, no, because a variable is defined by its constituents, which are clearly different then 20 years ago. You say, yes, because it is still the same axe he bought 20 years to chop wood with. Who's wrong here?