Since this is the first church I belong that uses Faith Promises, our method of doing Faith Promise may differ from other Faith Promises' models in other churches.

The church budgets benovolences, not missions money in its budget. Benovolence include Christian schools, seminaries, camps, pregnancy centers, homeless shelters, etc; but not to missionaries nor mission agencies. The church Mission committee will submit to the Session for their approval a list of missionaries and mission agencies to be supported by the church. Bottom line is that if the money comes in (designated as Faith Promise); everyone will receive their full support; if not then the Mission Committee will divvy up between the missionaries and missions. I think we designate Faith Promise, not to a particular missionary or agency on the approved list. AT least that is how I've done it.

So that is why it is called Faith Promise - it is a promise on faith as oppose to a more systematic way. I just see it as competing forces with the church budget; though basically they are the same.


John Chaney

"having been firmly rooted and now being built up in Him and established in your faith . . ." Colossians 2:7