Quote
Tom said:
<img src="/forum/images/graemlins/scratch1.gif" alt="" /> I am scratching my head, trying to think about why you think based on what I said, that I believe he shouldn't be examined. Did I not say:

Quote
It might be best to make certain he understands that issue, clearly before being baptized.

Oh Tom,

Don't scratch too hard or you will end up bald like me! <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/rofl.gif" alt="" /> In the first place, I couldn't resist rubbing you a bit for your "Baptist" statement that those baptized in a Baptist church "are saved"... it's that silly notion Credo's have about being able to create/maintain a "pure church". <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/evilgrin.gif" alt="" />

But I was NOT taking issue with you in regard to examining ALL applicants as you stated quite clearly that such should be the case. And in this we are in full agreement. Obviously, at least one is opposed to my/our presumption that one's profession is not to be taken as true until AFTER being examined and not before. [Linked Image]

In His grace,

[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]