Hi PrestorJohn,<br><br>I appreciate you pointing out those articles, though it does not help me to sort out the question as to whether or not Wilson advocates the errors of N.T. Wright leading him to distort the teaching of Justification by faith alone. Especially when Wilson himself writes such things as:<br><br><blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr>[color:"blue"]"One of the stranger elements made in the charge by the RPCUS was that the heretical teachings that they condemned in us were inspired by what has come to be called "The New Perspective" on Paul...While there are many insights of great value in this movement, particularly from Wright, I have to say that the foundational tenets of the New Perspective are off base. Those things of value that can be found there are not unique to the movement, and those things which distinguish the school of thought are erroneous." (Reformed is Not Enough)</font><hr></blockquote><p><br><br>So if someone tells me that Wilson is a subscriber to the New Perspective, I have to conclude that Wilson is a man ignorant of what the New Perspective teaches and actually believes it even though he says he does not (and although Wilson could be called many things, I don't think he could be called theologically ignorant), or that he is intentionally deceiving people as a wolf in sheep's clothing, or that perhaps some people have been guilty of handling this case in a "Ready, Shoot, Aim!" fashion. Sorry, but given what I have read from Wilson and from his critics, my money is on the latter.<br><br>Sincerely in Christ,<br><br>~Jason<br>