Originally Posted by Renat Ilyasov
Strictly speaking, the term "prerequisite [unto]" carries with it the idea of something to be done BEFORE or IN ORDER TO enter into something else it is the requirement thereunto..., The reprobate wicked cannot be saved EVEN IF they fulfilled the alleged universal "prerequisite" of faith and repentance, because CHRIST'S BLOOD WAS NOT SHED FOR THEM! To assert the opposite, implies a hypothetically universal, conditional atonement! To assert the contrary means that Christ in a certain sense died for all men (and we are back to the square one). But Christ did not die to redeem everybody, IF they fulfill the "prerequisite"! He died to save His people and He SHALL save His people from their sins.
Renat,

You really seem to have a problem with even "prerequisite", which obviously I do not. FYI, it was in a private conversation with the late Dr. John H. Gerstner that I was persuaded and convinced that "prerequisite" is an acceptable term to state that repentance and faith must come forth in order to be justified. Repentance and faith do no justify, but there is no justification without them. I am fortunately comfortable in using the term and you, unfortunately, are not. grin


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]