IF you have understood what I wrote as being in agreement with those stated by Luther, Calvin and Wesley, which you equate with the views on contraception of Rome, you are unfortunately and woefully mistaken. What I wrote was I and most conservative Reformed and Calvinistic Baptist churches are opposed to the use of any type of abortifacient, which I qualified as anything which effected a fertilized egg, and providing a couple examples; IUDs and the 'Morning After Pill'.

I would disagree with Luther, Calvin and Wesley in their interpretation and application of the case with Onan. How I interpret the passage in question is not the issue and I shall not bother to spend time exegeting the passage. And I do think the Roman State Church should spend far more energy on dealing with adultery, fornication, homosexuality, pornography, etc., which runs rampant through both its members and clergy rather than decrying the alleged horrible sin of a married couple choosing to use condoms or some other non-abortifacient.


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]