<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr>[color:"blue"]I would rather [color:red]not</font color=red> concur at the outset with a definition of the various schools.</font><hr></blockquote><p> Well if there is NO CLEAR definition of terms then I believe you will be discussing this for no reason at all. Without a firm definition(s) of the two sides then what have we to discuss? [img]http://www.the-highway.com/w3timages/icons/shrug.gif" alt="shrug" title="shrug[/img]<br><br>Basically, I would call myself in neither camp, but to some extents float in and out of both, i.e. I am always looking for evidence that confirms the TRUTH of God and His Word, which some see as mere suppositions, but personally I see as total fact.<br><br><ul> 1. the Scripture is true. This is not a presupposition, but a fact as confirmed by Christ, thus no argument. I see God as more than a mere pre-supposition...!<br>2. Since the Scripture is true, it provides its own evidence (1) by it own truthfulness (2) by God's confirming authority (3) by facts in history, et al.<br>3. Thus, to look at the article you posted I would simply say look at the Scripture alone and not at either system....., but evaluate them through faith in what the Scripure states....[/LIST] The measure of truth is Sola Scriptura! To believe in Sola Scriptura is more than a pre-supposition, i.e. an act of faith! And faith is the EVIDENCE.....

Reformed and Always Reforming,