Good words.

I have a question on how strict you interpret 'apt to teach'. I guess my question goes to effectiveness or giftedness in preaching from the pulpit. I know of men who are knowledgeable and trustworthy in their understanding of the Bible and doctrine, but are not gifted orators. They can lead/teach a Bible study or small group well, but not say teaching to a large group. Maybe I should use the word communicators than orators. I other words, they know their Bible and doctrine, but weak as communicators. Whereas others who may not know as much Bible and especially doctrine, but are gifted as communicators. They will be more appreciated by the congregation when they fill in for the pastor.

So does 'apt to teach' preclude those who are not strong communicators. I can see it both ways, but insisting them as being strong communicators is in a way adopting to worldy standards.

I think churches and men who are even Elders struggle with this.


John Chaney

"having been firmly rooted and now being built up in Him and established in your faith . . ." Colossians 2:7