Originally Posted by JesusFan
Should we be allowing for the mor einclusive lannguage such as in Niv 2011, or stay with traditional, such as in Kjv/Nasb?
I personally have no use for the NIV or any other translation that uses the Dynamic Equivalence method. But I'm not sure what you are referring to by "inclusive language"? shrug


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]