Tom, you don’t know when to quit when you’re ahead.

So in this latest video (see below), the author appears ok with letting the states determine the religion of choice. What denominations are making the cut. The rest of your responses in your last post do not even follow your main position…so you’re all over the place brother…. You cherry pick what statements you want to respond to (which I will easily pick apart) and disappear for days before responding - you don’t know how to converse in good faith.

On the previous video I posted, it seems the author’s intentions were good. He spoke of having a ten commandment statue or whatever erected in some local statehouse which seems like a token “victory” of some sort. I do think it’s good to awaken the consciences of local officials - I don’t want to be so cynical that I can’t see good in that. It seems like these are young men with young children. So I guess the individual Christian citizens is the target audience. Some of the things he said on that first linked podcast seemed bordering on absurd considering our current context. But it sounds like you are saying all government officials need to be catechized - which denomination should take the lead? How’s that going down in Canada - sounds like a fairytale. Try getting your people in the church pews first maybe.

I’m surprised (and not suprised it’s left somewhat unchallenged) that he admitted that the states decided what religion would be promoted (that can really backfire in this day and age).
https://www.youtube.com/live/Vs1sdVpY258?si=--50FqvFjJC9oiln

He also insists that religion/ideology is promoted regardless. I think this is why I’ve grown to favor natural law as a catalyst for what’s GOOD for society as natural law principles are most purely defined and upheld in biblical truth and reality - so why would we go down the road of trying to sway public opinion toward true religion for temporal ends. We can’t even get many people to accept true religion for the betterment of their own souls - why would they accept that for the government when they’re already seduced otherwise. I think it’s fine to communicate to your magistrates of their responsibilities before God and man. Do you believe church denominations is to be tasked with this or just private citizens?

However, we can’t even successfully point out that they are promoting religious principles based on anti-Christian unnatural law. That would probably be the best starting point.

Again, he has no practical plan, just a bunch good of sounding ideas. (My church already prays for the magistrates - what else do we need to do?)

How does his ideas get carried out on a national scale and what is the plan when the repercussions may result in the potential for state sponsored heretical religions. Why do we believe that the majority of the citizenry will support these efforts. What is the contingency plan if these efforts make us look like we are trying to take over the government and the freedom to practice true religion is adversely affected as a result?

Also, please acknowledge Pilgrim and whether he is right or wrong instead of acting like he’s not even a part of the discussion. Your silence to him makes it sound like you are taking the opinion of this author above his. I don’t really have a major horse in this fight but I’m not going to waste my time on a theory with no action plan. That’s a silly debate and a much sillier argument made to just feel good about oneself. At least it seems like Robin is actually doing something.

Last edited by Anthony C.; Tue Oct 21, 2025 8:43 PM.