Forum Search
Member Spotlight
Posts: 149
Joined: August 2021
Forum Statistics
Forums31
Topics8,376
Posts56,576
Members992
Most Online4,295
May 22nd, 2026
Top Posters
Pilgrim 15,047
Tom 4,893
chestnutmare 3,466
J_Edwards 2,615
John_C 1,906
Wes 1,856
RJ_ 1,583
MarieP 1,579
Robin 1,080
Top Posters(30 Days)
Pilgrim 34
Tom 3
John_C 2
Robin 1
Recent Posts
The Glorious Security of the Children of God
by NetChaplain - Mon Jun 08, 2026 11:52 AM
"There fell down many slain, because the war was of God."
by Pilgrim - Mon Jun 08, 2026 7:47 AM
"Ye that love the Lord hate evil."
by Pilgrim - Sun Jun 07, 2026 6:54 AM
Facts From Colossians
by NetChaplain - Fri Jun 05, 2026 11:23 AM
"The Lord shut him in."
by Pilgrim - Fri Jun 05, 2026 5:09 AM
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Hop To
#30349 Thu Jan 05, 2006 1:45 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 84
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 84
Hi All,

So, I've been reading a little about this "Emergent" movement or church and post-modernity or post-modernism, and one thing struck me. At least some post-modernist seem to be against this adversarial relationship of things like "knowledge and ignorance" or "dark and light" or whatever, but I've noticed that in this discussion it seems that there's only 2 sides, either "you're post-modernist or not" or "you're modernist or post-modernist", seems kind of two sided, and as my title suggest, I wondering about what I would guess must be the other (3rd)side, pre-modernity. I checked out that oft critized "wikipedia" site and my own dictionary (which has nothing because it's really old).

I just want to know the standard stuff you'd know about any position, who holds it, what defines it (beyond being whatever modernist and postmodernist are not) and why it's so disagreeable to post-modernist? I've heard a couple of professors at my school suggest that we can look at the pre-modern period (middle ages (please don't use that term "Dark Ages")) as Europe with God and the "Enlightenment" as Europe without God, so if the pre-modern period includes God, why doesn't anyone seem to argue for this? Do people just not like terms with "pre" as a prefix because it implies something hasn't arrived yet?

Whatever you can give me, it's appreciated.

-Brother Luke

P. S. Please don't waste my time telling me about the evils of Emergent or demonizing "POMO's", that's not what I'm asking about and I dare say that I am just as able as many of you of working through the issue myself (if I haven't already).

BrimstonePreacha #30350 Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:32 AM
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,615
Needs to get a Life
Offline
Needs to get a Life
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,615
You may enjoy Understanding the times: a strange postmodern world. The "normal" applies, however it is somewhat helpful with the terms....

You may find dividing the periods as such helpful from a philosophical perspective: Premodernity (Aquinas), Modernity (Hegel), and Postmodernity (Nietzsche) division of human history.


Reformed and Always Reforming,

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 4,008 guests, and 50 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Bosco, Mike, Puritan Steve, NSH123, Church44
992 Registered Users
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
June
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30
Today's Birthdays
Arashi-dono
Popular Topics(Views)
1,892,693 Gospel truth