The Highway Forums General Discussion Theology Discussion Forum we have a infallible born again spirit ,but our so

Why are some called the Word of faith?
Isn't better than the word of theology or reasonings, and natural logics?

Proverb:4:7: Wisdom is the principal thing; therefore get wisdom: and with all thy getting get understanding.

These terms are not defined by this verse. It is God's Spirit which is infallible and perfect. Our spirit is "preserved blameless" along with "body and soul." You claim that the human spirit of a believer is infallible, but this verse doesn't say that. Nor does any other passage of Scripture.

The only way to define these terms is to compare Scripture with Scripture. Not look up the word in a 21st century dictionary, nor theorize on what it means to you.


But Ecc 12:7 doesn't say what happens to the soul. It describes two things: "Dust" and spirit.

In the same book the author Solomon also writes,


Now if you insist on taking every passage of Scripture literally, then how do you resolve the apparent contradiction between this passage and the ones you use to describe an infallible and immortal human spirit (the inner man, or invisible part) in addition to body and soul (the outer man, or that which we can see)?


I still see only two "parts" mentioned here; spirit and belly. The words "spirit," "breath," "life," and "soul" are most often interchangable in both Testaments.


None of the Scriptures you quoted teach any such thing! But instead of proving anything, you simply re-state the same thesis over and over again, as if you can win the argument by mere repetition.

So explain why Ecclesiastes 3:19-21 should not be interpreted in the same way you have interpreted 1st Thessalonians 5:23.

Evangelist,

You stated:
I am glad that you understand my point so well. It is also like saying that my soul and my spirit are 2 different things, when the preponderance of usage indicates that they are not.

Evangelist, no one here is interested in fighting with you over how well either of us can count. The issue we are engaging you with so much patience is because of the massive negative implications for the gospel, the church, and the glory of Christ when your approach is used as the basis for doctrines which are not in line with the truth.

New life by the power of the Spirit of God.


The "incorruptible seed" is the word of God (I Pet. 1:23). We do not "get" it, but are reborn by it.


If the sinner gets a "brand new spirit," what happens to the old one? And why not also a "brand new soul"? You're adding to Scripture. The spirit of the believer is REBORN, not replaced. But that does not make the believer's spirit infallible.

Is this some kind of game you are playing, or is it that you have terrible reading comprehension?
Regarding your question about: "Why are some called the Word of faith?"
That is what they call themselves and I should know because I used to be in the movement myself. Also as it has been shown you before, beyond a reasonable doubt, they are a cult.
However, this is off topic.

Tom

2Co:5:17: Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new.
2Co:5:18: And all things are of God, who hath reconciled us to himself by Jesus Christ, and hath given to us the ministry of reconciliation;

Ga:4:5: To redeem them that were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons.
Ga:4:6: And because ye are sons, God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying, Abba, Father.
Ga:4:7: Wherefore thou art no more a servant, but a son; and if a son, then an heir of God through Christ.

It is off the topic , i am discussing our born again spirits, not a cult or religion at large.

I think 1 thess 5:23 really is to easy to misunderstand or misinterpretate, because it in itself explain our three parts.
Do I need to go into the Greek to get a clearer understanding?

Now I know this is a game you are playing. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/nono.gif" alt="" />

Tom

Yes, you do! And you need to compare Scripture with Scripture rather than some TBN teacher's suppositions.

Robin

It is my opinion that evangelist is more interested in playing games, than actually learning.
I for one don't want to be a part of that anymore.

Tom

He hasn't answered anybody's questions. Nor can he. Instead he just keeps repeating the same assertions using out-of-context Bible verses and putting heretical meaning to terms.

I hope this dicussion is over now. As far as I'm concerned it is...

There are other scriptures to prove this is right I jsu went to the simple one which a blind person would see and understand it .But the bible does say in the miuth of to or three witness.

There are other scriptures to prove this is right I just went to the simple one which a blind person would see and understand it .But the bible does say in the miuth of to or three witness.

This is the same responce I got from Catholics and JHW.
Are you a Catholic?