|
|
|
|
|
Posts: 713
Joined: May 2016
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,484
Posts56,713
Members995
| |
Most Online4,295
May 22nd, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Socialism
by Pilgrim - Mon Aug 17, 2026 2:55 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,139 Likes: 320
Head Honcho
|
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,139 Likes: 320 |
John asks:
The WCF distinguishes the way in which the elect and the reprobate are "set apart" by using the word "predestinated" for the elect and "foreordained" for the reprobate. My question is what is difference between the two words and why not just say some were predestinated for life and some were predestinated for death? Is the process of predestining different in some way from the process of foreordaining? Quick answer . . . Predestination is generally that aspect of God's decree which is salvific in nature, e.g., election to salvation in Christ. Foreordination is the general term used to designate and include ALL things that God has decreed. There is definitely a difference between God's election and reprobation of mankind. One is "positive" and the other "negative". Providentially, the new article just posted, Calvin on the Sovereignty of God covers this topic quite nicely. See also, R.C. Sproul's article, Double Predestination. And, The Double Predestination to Holiness and Sin, by W.G.T. Shedd. In His Grace,
![[Linked Image]](http://www.the-highway.com/pilgrim/pil_sig2.gif) simul iustus et peccator![[Linked Image]](http://www.the-highway.com/Smileys/pencil.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
245
guests, and
98
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
