|
|
|
|
|
Posts: 118
Joined: July 2025
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,378
Posts56,578
Members992
| |
Most Online4,295
May 22nd, 2026
|
|
|
#33531
Tue Jul 11, 2006 7:48 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,906 Likes: 1
Permanent Resident
|
OP
Permanent Resident
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,906 Likes: 1 |
I know there are two schools of thought on the dating of John's Epistles - 66-67 AD or 90-95 AD. What has been the dominant view during the history of the church? I have always thought it was the latter; but I read someone positing it as the former, saying that the dispensational influence moved the dating forward to the 90-95 dating? Is this just partial preteriest post-mill rhetoric? If so, it makes me wonder if they are just out in left field as much as the dispy pre-mills.
John Chaney
"having been firmly rooted and now being built up in Him and established in your faith . . ." Colossians 2:7
|
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
684
guests, and
14
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
