|
|
|
|
|
Posts: 1,906
Joined: September 2001
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,381
Posts56,581
Members992
| |
Most Online4,295
May 22nd, 2026
|
|
|
#46668
Sun Jun 05, 2011 7:24 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,893 Likes: 49
Needs to get a Life
|
OP
Needs to get a Life
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,893 Likes: 49 |
On the Van Till thread I mentioned that the people at Red Beetle, made the accusation that James White believes like non King James Bibles that Lucifer is the "Bright and Morning Star".
I am assuming Red Beetle is referencing Rev. 2:28 & Rev. 22:16. I looked these verses up in the NIV and a few other Bibles. What I noticed is that unless I am missing something, all the versions I have looked up have Jesus as "the bright and morning star."
Thus it appears to me that this accusation against James White and non-KJ Bibles is a lie.
Personally I am not sure why they would make this accusation, for it was a little too easy to prove their accusation wrong. I am not sure what James White believes concerning this, but it would appear that if this is any indication; on both fronts Red Beetle accusation is based on a lie.
This is a little ironic, because they say James White’s book on the King James controversy is based on lies.
I wouldn’t mind getting some feedback on this.
Tom
|
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
The Bright and Morning Star
|
Tom
|
Sun Jun 05, 2011 11:24 PM
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
71
guests, and
5
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
