Pilgrim, I have been called a hyper-calvininist by men who think themselves to be calvinists. This does'nt bother me of course because on closer examination these calvinists are not calvininists but arminians (free-will calvinists ).
I am begining to think that hyper-calvinism does not even exist. I have read nothing to convince me that this theologian or that theologian is hyper.
I am still waiting for help on this but I really expect little because it is VERY VERY difficult to denounce hyper-calvinism without exposing oneself to the charge of arminianism. There is no middle ground - as far as I can see.
Murray and Stonehouse may well have been calvinists but that free-offer booklet most certainly IS NOT calvinism. Calvin would be horrified if he read such stuff don't you think ?
