I have consistently seen others, who need not be named, require others to prove their beliefs and practices by scripture alone. I am wondering if this is defensible. Did any early church writers, reformers, or any group prior to the extreme Puritans hold to Solo Scriptura? Isn't there a big difference? Sola Scriptura meaning scripture that scripture is the ultimate and final authority, whereas Solo Scriptura means only what's found in scripture? Is Solo Scriptura defendable by Solo Scriptura?<br><br><br>God bless,<br><br>william
