|
|
|
|
|
Posts: 15,038
Joined: April 2001
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,364
Posts56,564
Members992
| |
Most Online4,295
May 22nd, 2026
|
|
|
#58775
Sat Dec 09, 2023 7:36 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,893 Likes: 49
Needs to get a Life
|
OP
Needs to get a Life
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,893 Likes: 49 |
In the past while I have been noticing quite the debate that is not always
respectful concerning the long ending of Mark.
It usually has to do with the KJV and the TR.
James White’s name is sometimes brought into the conversation.
Personally speaking, I favour keeping the long ending, not because of the KJV and
the TR. Rather because as I read it, I see nothing that contradicts with other
portions of Scripture.
I would be interested in getting some feed back on this.
Tom
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 77
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 77 |
In
Personally speaking, I favour keeping the long ending, not because of the KJV and
the TR. Rather because as I read it, I see nothing that contradicts with other
portions of Scripture.
I would be interested in getting some feed back on this.
Tom Plus, its the only place - at least in the KJV and similar ones - which says that the resurrection took place on the first day of the week
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 537
Addict
|
|
Addict
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 537 |
there is n ot really though good textual evidence for the longer ending, and many scholars would see it as being someone scribes inserting and adding onto the original text to smooth over its abrupt ending the works and deeds done by the Apostles themselves as escribed in Acts
|
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
247
guests, and
17
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
