Quote
Tom said:
I think that should be quite obvious, for since Spurgeon wrote a lot against the hyper-Calvinism of his day, he would get a lot of negative feed back.
In our day there are people such as Dave Hunt that believe Spurgeon was an Arminian. This is despite the evidence to the contrary.

I will say however, defining what the term "hyper-Calvinist" is, is kind of like nailing jello to a wall.
I believe for the most part in what Phil Johnson defined hyper-Calvinism as, but there are so many who disagree, that the term is not all that helpful.

Tom

It might be hard to define, but to give up because something is hard is to admit defeat. How would you define them?