|

|
|
|
Posts: 706
Joined: May 2016
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,347
Posts56,542
Members992
| |
Most Online2,383 Jan 12th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,040
Persnickety Presbyterian 
|
Persnickety Presbyterian 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,040 |
hisalone said:
I asked where it shows in scripture prior to the flood that God had given the law to maintain a pure line from Seth? Your saying this is so, has established that God had a law in place prior to the Mosaic law, for me, that is contradicting scripture and makes your whole position questionable. How is it "contradicting Scripture" to say that God had a law in place prior to Moses? Why would God punish ANYONE if there was no law? I've already demonstrated that the idea of not intermarrying with unbelievers is not exclusive to the Mosaic economy, that it is in fact explicit in the New Testament. I've also demonstrated that it is constantly grounded in the prohibition of idolatry (the idea being that unbelieving spouses will lead believers into idolatry). This means that it is a MORAL prohibition, having to do with the very essence of righteousness. Or do you think that the Sethites were not prohibited from practicing idolatry, or that Christians may freely marry unbelievers? The many questions it generates also cause me to label it as questionable. Again, what are these unresolveable questions? There have been more pointers for Angels than Seth's line. It is always the same argument from your side, like a broken record, angels not given in marriage, God calling men the sons of God and that there was a specific mandate that those who believed in God could not marry those who did not. It has been showed these could not be proved and yet you continue to hold on to them. On the contrary, you haven't demonstrated anything. You have only asserted & have produced no argument. If you want to produce an actual argument with exegesis of the passages in question, please do! If you want to list out all of the unresolveable questions you have, please do! (But you also need to actually respond to our answers, and not simply say that our answers are "unproveable.) Otherwise, please refrain from your "broken record" assertions about how what we're saying is unproveable and generates more questions than your position does.
Kyle
I tell you, this man went down to his house justified.
|
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Demons and fallen angels
|
hisalone
|
Mon Jul 07, 2008 1:51 PM
|
Re: Demons and fallen angels
|
MarieP
|
Mon Jul 07, 2008 8:19 PM
|
Highway thread on this topic
|
MarieP
|
Mon Jul 07, 2008 8:27 PM
|
Re: Demons and fallen angels
|
hisalone
|
Mon Jul 07, 2008 8:56 PM
|
Re: Demons and fallen angels
|
CovenantInBlood
|
Mon Jul 07, 2008 10:30 PM
|
Re: Demons and fallen angels
|
hisalone
|
Mon Jul 07, 2008 10:42 PM
|
Re: Demons and fallen angels
|
CovenantInBlood
|
Tue Jul 08, 2008 12:53 AM
|
Re: Demons and fallen angels
|
William
|
Tue Jul 08, 2008 1:16 AM
|
Re: Demons and fallen angels
|
Robin
|
Tue Jul 08, 2008 9:40 AM
|
Re: Demons and fallen angels
|
hisalone
|
Tue Jul 08, 2008 2:12 PM
|
Re: Demons and fallen angels
|
William
|
Tue Jul 08, 2008 7:52 PM
|
Re: Demons and fallen angels
|
hisalone
|
Tue Jul 08, 2008 8:53 PM
|
Re: Demons and fallen angels
|
Pilgrim
|
Tue Jul 08, 2008 9:43 PM
|
Re: Demons and fallen angels
|
hisalone
|
Wed Jul 09, 2008 10:24 AM
|
Re: Demons and fallen angels
|
CovenantInBlood
|
Thu Jul 10, 2008 3:49 AM
|
Re: Demons and fallen angels
|
hisalone
|
Thu Jul 10, 2008 11:57 AM
|
Re: Demons and fallen angels
|
Pilgrim
|
Thu Jul 10, 2008 3:32 PM
|
Re: Demons and fallen angels
|
CovenantInBlood
|
Thu Jul 10, 2008 11:56 PM
|
Re: Demons and fallen angels
|
hisalone
|
Fri Jul 11, 2008 12:06 PM
|
Re: Demons and fallen angels
|
CovenantInBlood
|
Sat Jul 12, 2008 3:57 AM
|
Re: Demons and fallen angels
|
hisalone
|
Sat Jul 12, 2008 1:17 PM
|
Re: Demons and fallen angels
|
CovenantInBlood
|
Sat Jul 12, 2008 4:02 PM
|
Re: Demons and fallen angels
|
Pilgrim
|
Sat Jul 12, 2008 4:15 PM
|
Re: Demons and fallen angels
|
hisalone
|
Sun Jul 13, 2008 8:24 PM
|
Re: Demons and fallen angels
|
William
|
Thu Jul 10, 2008 5:35 PM
|
Re: Demons and fallen angels
|
hisalone
|
Thu Jul 10, 2008 6:36 PM
|
Re: Demons and fallen angels
|
olpo25
|
Sat Jul 19, 2008 10:18 PM
|
Re: Demons and fallen angels
|
Adopted
|
Tue Jul 08, 2008 7:51 PM
|
Re: Demons and fallen angels
|
Tom
|
Thu Jul 10, 2008 3:38 AM
|
Re: Demons and fallen angels
|
Pilgrim
|
Tue Jul 08, 2008 9:16 PM
|
Re: Demons and fallen angels
|
hisalone
|
Tue Jul 08, 2008 9:53 PM
|
Re: Demons and fallen angels
|
Pilgrim
|
Wed Jul 09, 2008 1:27 AM
|
Re: Demons and fallen angels
|
olpo25
|
Mon Jul 21, 2008 1:42 AM
|
Jesus on the marriagibility of angels
|
MarieP
|
Mon Jul 21, 2008 1:02 PM
|
Re: Jesus on the marriagibility of angels
|
JET
|
Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:52 AM
|
Re: Jesus on the marriagibility of angels
|
MarieP
|
Tue Jul 22, 2008 1:32 PM
|
Re: Jesus on the marriagibility of angels
|
hisalone
|
Tue Jul 22, 2008 2:22 PM
|
Re: Jesus on the marriageability of angels
|
Pilgrim
|
Tue Jul 22, 2008 2:54 PM
|
Re: Jesus on the marriageability of angels
|
hisalone
|
Tue Jul 22, 2008 3:24 PM
|
Re: Jesus on the marriageability of angels
|
hisalone
|
Tue Jul 22, 2008 5:25 PM
|
Re: Jesus on the marriageability of angels
|
Pilgrim
|
Wed Jul 23, 2008 1:17 AM
|
Re: Jesus on the marriageability of angels
|
hisalone
|
Wed Jul 23, 2008 10:48 AM
|
Re: Jesus on the marriageability of angels
|
Pilgrim
|
Wed Jul 23, 2008 2:20 PM
|
Re: Jesus on the marriageability of angels
|
CovenantInBlood
|
Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:06 PM
|
Re: Jesus on the marriageability of angels
|
CovenantInBlood
|
Tue Jul 22, 2008 10:36 PM
|
Re: Jesus on the marriagibility of angels
|
Peter
|
Sat Jul 26, 2008 9:35 PM
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
636
guests, and
28
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|