You're right that I haven't read of all of MikeL's posts. I have paid closer attention to his responses to me, and only a little attention to his other interactions. My impression was that he came with honest (and probing) questions, became offended by someone's overly rough approach with him, and began to cause more trouble after that. In other words, my impression was that MikeL was only partly to blame for the less than charitable tone of the discussions, and that we might be able to improve the overall tone if we were more careful not to be disrespectful towards him. That said, my overall impression is not as informed as it would have been had I read all of the conversations that he has been involved in, and I will defer to whatever decision you guys make as administrators. You've been paying closer attention than I have.

Take care,
John

"He that hath light thoughts of sin, never had great thoughts of God." ...John Owen