Quote
asterisktom said:
Now if you read this, you can discern his quite un-Biblical Ordo Salutis already in this very article.

I am willing to substantiate this claim if anyone is interested.
Well Tom, I am interested in how you can see anything of Tozer's alleged "ordo salutis" in that article. Tozer was not a Calvinist by any means and this is clearly seen where he talks of Christ having reconciled all of mankind; even the entire world, which any discerning reader would simply offer a chuckle and read on. But having read through the article myriad times, I am unable to find his "un-Biblical Ordo Salutis". So, could you point it out to me please? <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />

FYI, the article was made available in order to defend God's immanence and active providence over against modern Deism. And, to also defend the fact that the Bible as God's inspired written Word is the only source of truth by which one may be saved. That was Tozer's purpose in what he wrote.

In His Grace,

[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]