Originally Posted by Tom
Pilgrim you mentioned something that you had previously posted written by the Remonstants. Can you please provide a link to it?
I am assuming that you mentioned it because DeYoung believes the Remonstrants understanding of the issue.
1. Interestingly enough, the post I was referring to was in response to you. giggle It can be found HERE

2. The reason I mentioned this is not because it deals with the same subject but rather to give you an example of how someone can make a statement which on its face looks very sound but when it is further examined by other things the same author(s) wrote, it takes upon a whole different meaning than one would naturally assume it to be.

[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]