Forum Search
Member Spotlight
John_C
John_C
Mississippi Gulf Coast
Posts: 1,906
Joined: September 2001
Forum Statistics
Forums31
Topics8,382
Posts56,582
Members992
Most Online4,295
May 22nd, 2026
Top Posters
Pilgrim 15,052
Tom 4,893
chestnutmare 3,467
J_Edwards 2,615
John_C 1,906
Wes 1,856
RJ_ 1,583
MarieP 1,579
Robin 1,080
Top Posters(30 Days)
Pilgrim 33
John_C 2
Robin 1
Tom 1
Recent Posts
"Delight thyself also in the Lord."
by Pilgrim - Sun Jun 14, 2026 5:20 AM
"Whosoever will, let him take the water of life freely."
by Pilgrim - Sat Jun 13, 2026 6:04 AM
"Thou art weighed in the balances and art found wanting."
by Pilgrim - Fri Jun 12, 2026 6:03 AM
"We love Him because He first loved us."
by Pilgrim - Thu Jun 11, 2026 6:45 AM
Comfort in Affliction
by chestnutmare - Wed Jun 10, 2026 6:35 AM
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Hop To
#5706 Wed Sep 17, 2003 10:56 PM
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
I subscribe to a Wesleyan mailing list, and the topic at the moment is Preterism. It seems that Preterism has infiltrated its way into the Wesleyan tradition. Interestingly enough, many blame Preterism on Calvinism:

In reply to:
[color:"blue"]Which preterists do they side with? Most preterists I know of are of the Reformed persuasion, and they divide into two groups: "full" preterists (John Noe, David Chilton, Kelly Nelson Burks), who believe the second coming happened in A.D. 70; and "partial" preterists (R.C. Sproul, Kenneth Gentry, Keith Mathison, Gary DeMar), who believe the events of A.D. 70 only prefigured a "final coming" of Christ which is still future. DeMar makes the most coherent argument, but most partial preterists come across as rather confused and inconsistent because they want to keep their distance from the "radical" full preterists, whom they consider heretics.
 
As a Wesleyan, I must confess that I find it amusing to watch these people argue with each other. The nature of Reformed theology is such that if one embraces a preteristic interpretation of eschatology, the logical outcome is full preterism. This is an uncomfortable fact which partial preterists refuse to acknowledge and, as a result, some of them (particularly Gentry and Mathison) have adopted a most uncharitable attitude toward those they call "hyper-preterists."
 
In reality, preterism is just a reverse form of dispensationalism, so I would question whether the dichotomy between "the preterists" and "the dispensationalists" is valid. I tend to see the two different approaches to eschatology as incarnational/covenental (more consistent with a Wesleyan perspective and, IMHO, more in keeping with Apostolic Tradition) and systematic/dispensational (most prevalent in Reformed and fundamentalist circles).



What are your opinions on this? From what I've read, most Reformed theologians prefer amillennialism.


Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
Cant those within the Wesleyan tradition work it out for themselves .........................<br><br><br>howard

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,615
Needs to get a Life
Offline
Needs to get a Life
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,615
Most of the Reformed Tradition do take either a A-MIl or Post-Mil view of things as we believe this is what the Scripture clearly teaches. There have been many in other traditions (and even in Reformed circles) that have taken the different views. Here is a link to several articles that may assist you in your study for truth. Select Eschatology.


Reformed and Always Reforming,
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
(I thought it was funny..)


Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 71 guests, and 12 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Bosco, Mike, Puritan Steve, NSH123, Church44
992 Registered Users
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
June
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30
Today's Birthdays
There are no members with birthdays on this day.
Popular Topics(Views)
1,896,386 Gospel truth