Joe

I am feeling a little bit venturesome today. I just hope not too venturesome, because I am no match when it comes to education on these matters. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/argue.gif" alt="" />
If my knowledge comes to an end, regardless of whether or not I agree with you or not, I will bow out.

So be easy on me, big guy. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/coffee2.gif" alt="" />

My understanding of what you are saying is that basically that this matter must be interpreted through the eyes of the Abrahamic Covenant. Is that correct?

If so, then it is my understanding as Dr. Fred Malone put it.
“However, it is my belief that the fuller revelation of the New Covenant must define how the Abrahamic Covenant is fulfilled in it, rather than letting the Abrahamic Covenant interpret the New Covenant revelation of its fulfillment. It is the principle by describing the relationship between the testaments with the little rhyme:
The New is the Old concealed
The Old is the New revealed.”

Tom