I'm surprised you label traducianism as a false belief. According to Alan Scholes, Jonathan Edwards held the traducian view.

Quote
Traducianism was held by Church Fathers: Tertullian, Rufinus, Apollinarus and Gregory of Nyssa. This is the view of many Lutherans as well as Jonathan Edwards, Shedd, Strong, and (with reservations) Buswell...

I'm inclined toward traducianism because it accounts for the hereditary defect that makes every person born of a human father guilty of the sin of Adam and utterly corrupt at conception. How does Creationism account for the inborn sin which inheres to man's nature?