Pilgrim,
You say in your response “If He was endowed with non posse non peccare, the guarantee to never sin, then the temptations were pointless…, isn’t that holding the whole drama of salvation in check, until our Savior does or does not accomplish what the first Adam failed to do? Being a bit of a “hyper Calvinist”, I find the logic that there was a chance that Jesus could have succumbed to temptation, hard to accept. It would place the omniscience of the Father in question (at least in my mind). Is this not a kind of “Open Theism”, with an “infralapsarian” bent?
Geomic1