Posts: 15,025
Joined: April 2001
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,348
Posts56,543
Members992
| |
Most Online2,383 Jan 12th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,025 Likes: 274
Head Honcho
|
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,025 Likes: 274 |
Joe k said: Then Pilgrim, your seminary is wrong in its definition!!!! . . . Where did you go the PRC seminary in GR Michigan? The definition of what? BTW, it is hardly my seminary! <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/rofl.gif" alt="" /> Yes, the PRC seminary was one which I studied at. And as much as it has proven to be impossible to do, I would prefer to forget the time I spent there. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" /> Joe k continues: Benevolence is not denied by true HC's, but saving grace, agape grace per se is denied. Of which I agree with.The scripture of the sun and rain is used to promote some common grace, but it is in serious error, becuase if that were the case then those who receive more sun or more rain would be considered in better shape!!!!. Let's understand one thing here. One would be hard-pressed to find any individual and/or group that would attribute the term "hyper-Calvinist" to themselves. Secondly, no true Calvinist would affirm that true grace, i.e., salvific grace pertains to any but the elect. Thirdly, as you would find from reading some of the past discussions here in regard to the topic of "Common Grace", many of us who are within the historic, traditional Calvinistic camp lament over the actual term "Common grace" as it more often than not creates unnecessary confusion; ala "grace". However, that God displays kindness/benevolence, in that He has withheld immediate judgment upon them and also providentially provides for their sustenance in many cases cannot be denied. Since it is within God's sovereign prerogative to give whatever He wills to whomsoever He wills, the lack which some may experience is no argument against the fact that He does, in fact, show kindness to the reprobate as well as the elect. Joe k continues: I will tell you who the true Hypers are, and that are the hardshellers. Those who say an elect person can live their whole life without coming to faith. Those that do not evangelize. Those who look for evidence of ones election before preaching the Gospel. WHo was the guy who argued with William Gadsby about evangelising? He was a hardsheller. Your definition simply doesn't fit the term, "hyper- Calvinist" because to deny the necessity of one coming to faith in Christ for salvation is not only outside the pale of Calvinism, it is contrary to historic Christianity as a whole. The accepted understanding of "hyper" is that which is "above, beyond, a distortion of" Calvinism. That such people who describe as "hardshellers" are extremist is true. But I cannot consider them to be even loosely Calvinists. In His grace,
simul iustus et peccator
|
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Hyper-calvinist
|
knoxandcalvin
|
Fri Dec 16, 2005 11:47 PM
|
Re: Hyper-calvinist
|
Anonymous
|
Sat Dec 17, 2005 3:47 AM
|
Re: Hyper-calvinist
|
Anonymous
|
Sat Dec 17, 2005 12:15 PM
|
Re: Hyper-calvinist
|
Joe k
|
Sat Dec 17, 2005 1:35 PM
|
Re: Hyper-Calvinist
|
Pilgrim
|
Sat Dec 17, 2005 5:05 PM
|
Re: Hyper-Calvinist
|
Joe k
|
Sat Dec 17, 2005 6:29 PM
|
Re: Hyper-Calvinist
|
Pilgrim
|
Sat Dec 17, 2005 8:55 PM
|
Re: Hyper-Calvinist
|
Joe k
|
Sat Dec 17, 2005 10:44 PM
|
Re: Hyper-Calvinist
|
Pilgrim
|
Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:36 PM
|
Re: Hyper-Calvinist
|
Joe k
|
Fri Dec 23, 2005 11:45 AM
|
Re: Hyper-Calvinist
|
knoxandcalvin
|
Sat Dec 17, 2005 10:50 PM
|
Re: Hyper-Calvinist
|
li0scc0
|
Mon Dec 19, 2005 4:15 PM
|
Re: Hyper-Calvinist
|
knoxandcalvin
|
Mon Dec 19, 2005 7:34 PM
|
Re: Hyper-Calvinist
|
Anonymous
|
Mon Dec 19, 2005 7:38 PM
|
Re: Hyper-Calvinist
|
Pilgrim
|
Mon Dec 19, 2005 9:13 PM
|
Re: Hyper-Calvinist
|
Anonymous
|
Tue Dec 27, 2005 12:43 PM
|
Re: Hyper-Calvinist
|
Joe k
|
Tue Dec 27, 2005 2:17 PM
|
Re: Hyper-Calvinist
|
Anonymous
|
Tue Dec 27, 2005 3:05 PM
|
Re: Hyper-Calvinist
|
Joe k
|
Tue Dec 27, 2005 3:36 PM
|
Re: Hyper-Calvinist
|
Pilgrim
|
Tue Dec 27, 2005 8:27 PM
|
Re: Hyper-Calvinist
|
Anonymous
|
Wed Dec 28, 2005 11:02 AM
|
Re: Hyper-Calvinist
|
Pilgrim
|
Wed Dec 28, 2005 1:12 PM
|
Re: Hyper-calvinist
|
Tom
|
Sun Dec 18, 2005 5:30 AM
|
Re: Hyper-calvinist
|
Anonymous
|
Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:34 AM
|
Re: Hyper-calvinist
|
Tom
|
Fri Dec 23, 2005 5:14 AM
|
Re: Hyper-calvinist
|
Anonymous
|
Fri Dec 23, 2005 8:05 AM
|
Re: Hyper-calvinist
|
Tom
|
Fri Dec 23, 2005 7:18 PM
|
Re: Hyper-calvinist
|
Anonymous
|
Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:38 AM
|
Re: Hyper-calvinist
|
Tom
|
Tue Dec 27, 2005 10:09 PM
|
Re: Hyper-calvinist
|
William
|
Mon Dec 26, 2005 2:34 PM
|
Re: Hyper-calvinist
|
Pilgrim
|
Mon Dec 26, 2005 4:56 PM
|
Re: Hyper-calvinist
|
knoxandcalvin
|
Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:27 PM
|
Re: Hyper-calvinist
|
Pilgrim
|
Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:43 PM
|
Re: Hyper-calvinist
|
knoxandcalvin
|
Tue Dec 20, 2005 12:16 AM
|
Re: Hyper-calvinist
|
Joe k
|
Fri Dec 23, 2005 11:40 AM
|
Re: Hyper-calvinist
|
John_C
|
Sat Dec 24, 2005 1:06 PM
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
107
guests, and
40
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|