He is not a charasmatic and does not believe the movement that started 110 years ago. In his book God's Work of several, he declares this. He did not advocate second blessing. That is a lie. His desire for logic and reason is bar none, impeccable. He should have been a philosophy teacher. Quite a genius indeed. He does not have contempt for orthodoxy. Nee helped build the church in China. That is where he lived so that was his role to play, through houses, assemblies, everything. This is God's desire. He was not fed up with anything. He simply recognized which is God's common sense that demonations all have an angle they are pursuing and that God did not ordain denominations if the denomination is holding unto some part untruth like required water baptism or legalizing a local city or calvanism or state churches for the country or charasmatic movement or gibberish. It was all not quite right marrying church to state, even in ammelianism or false preterism as partial rapture brings together pre and post trib. He recognized tripartate man and did not believe in fallen man's view of bipartate man.<br><br>He had no problem with church organization but he had issues if as a denomination it held unto some untruth and built itself on that basis. Nee's love of reason is bar none for he had the best reason of them all, stronger and more talented than almost all, strong just like Paul in the NT. Nee emplores you to use your mind more than most. He implores you to allow your spirit to be strengthened. Can you do that? Will you let God do that for you?<br><br>Do you see what Nee teaches as oppossed to what you think he teaches?<br><br>Nee was very unassuming. Can you be just as unassuming as he was?
