|

|
|
|
Posts: 706
Joined: May 2016
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,349
Posts56,545
Members992
| |
Most Online4,295 Yesterday at 09:40 PM
|
|
|
#3911
Fri Jul 11, 2003 11:11 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,026 Likes: 274
Head Honcho
|
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,026 Likes: 274 |
Things haven't changed much since that eventful day. The Serpent still speaks with a "forked tongue"!  Remember, it is recorded of the Serpent, " Now the serpent was more subtle than any beast of the field which Jehovah God had made." (Gen 3:1) and " He was a murderer from the beginning, and standeth not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father thereof." (Jh 8:44) I think it can be rightly said, therefore, that the Devil is a "subtle ![[Linked Image]](http://www.the-highway.com/Smileys/liar.gif) ". His modus operandi is to intermix truth and error in cleverly couched language so as to convince men of that which is contrary to God's truth. (A good example of this is the current attempt of those following the teachings of Norman Shepherd, e.g., Doug Wilson, Steve Schlissel, Wright, et al, to distort the biblical and historical teaching of Sola Fide) So, in the Serpent's words: " Ye shall not surely die: for God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as God, knowing good and evil.", there is some truth and lots of error. The most obvious error is the total contradiction of what God had originally told Adam, " but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die." Of course, one could possibly say that even in regard to the Devil's denial of the threat of death was partially true in that physical death was only germinate on that day and didn't actually occur until centuries later. But of course we know that the "death" which God promised would take place should Adam eat of the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil was three-fold and not restricted to physical death. Secondly, it is also partially true, in one sense, that their eyes were opened and they were able to determine good and evil. But once again, this is a distortion of truth. Their eyes were "opened" indeed, but in the sense that this was in regard to Adam and Eve's own estimation. They thought they could see, but they were blind. They thought they were able to discern good from evil. But in fact, all they were able to do was to ascertain the lesser of evils and had no comprehension or even desire for that which was good; they were DEAD to all that pertained to God and His holiness, righteousness and goodness. The bottom line, IMHO, is that what the Serpent said would happen should Eve eat the fruit did NOT come to pass.  In His Grace,
simul iustus et peccator
|
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Marks of Heresy
|
Anonymous
|
Mon Jul 07, 2003 11:02 PM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Wes
|
Mon Jul 07, 2003 11:15 PM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
MarieP
|
Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:20 PM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Anonymous
|
Wed Jul 09, 2003 11:01 AM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Anonymous
|
Wed Jul 09, 2003 6:41 PM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Pilgrim
|
Wed Jul 09, 2003 7:29 PM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Anonymous
|
Thu Jul 10, 2003 2:14 AM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Anonymous
|
Thu Jul 10, 2003 12:06 PM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Anonymous
|
Thu Jul 10, 2003 9:01 PM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Anonymous
|
Fri Jul 11, 2003 12:04 AM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Pilgrim
|
Fri Jul 11, 2003 12:26 AM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Anonymous
|
Fri Jul 11, 2003 1:44 AM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Pilgrim
|
Fri Jul 11, 2003 2:40 AM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Anonymous
|
Fri Jul 11, 2003 1:37 PM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Pilgrim
|
Fri Jul 11, 2003 3:11 PM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
carlos
|
Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:18 PM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Jason1646
|
Sat Jul 12, 2003 12:28 PM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Pilgrim
|
Sat Jul 12, 2003 1:23 PM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Jason1646
|
Sat Jul 12, 2003 2:43 PM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Pilgrim
|
Sat Jul 12, 2003 5:10 PM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Jason1646
|
Sat Jul 12, 2003 10:11 PM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Pilgrim
|
Sat Jul 12, 2003 10:59 PM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Jason1646
|
Sat Jul 12, 2003 11:25 PM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Pilgrim
|
Sun Jul 13, 2003 12:13 AM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Jason1646
|
Sun Jul 13, 2003 12:30 AM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Pilgrim
|
Sun Jul 13, 2003 12:41 AM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Anonymous
|
Sun Jul 13, 2003 5:26 AM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Pilgrim
|
Tue Jul 15, 2003 2:11 PM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Jason1646
|
Tue Jul 15, 2003 7:41 PM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Anonymous
|
Tue Jul 15, 2003 8:35 PM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Jason1646
|
Wed Jul 16, 2003 12:28 PM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Anonymous
|
Wed Jul 16, 2003 10:01 PM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Jason1646
|
Fri Jul 18, 2003 7:01 PM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Anonymous
|
Fri Jul 18, 2003 10:00 PM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Pilgrim
|
Tue Jul 15, 2003 9:17 PM
|
more on Schlissel
|
carlos
|
Sat Jul 19, 2003 12:32 AM
|
Re: more on Schlissel
|
Jason1646
|
Sat Jul 19, 2003 1:10 AM
|
Re: more on Schlissel
|
carlos
|
Sun Jul 20, 2003 2:13 AM
|
Re: more on Schlissel
|
Jason1646
|
Sun Jul 20, 2003 3:31 PM
|
Re: more on Schlissel
|
Pilgrim
|
Sun Jul 20, 2003 8:29 PM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Anonymous
|
Sun Jul 20, 2003 10:49 PM
|
Re: Shepherd's teaching online
|
Pilgrim
|
Sun Jul 13, 2003 12:49 PM
|
Re: Shepherd's teaching online
|
Jason1646
|
Sun Jul 13, 2003 4:02 PM
|
Re: Shepherd's teaching online
|
Anonymous
|
Sun Jul 20, 2003 9:35 PM
|
Re: Shepherd's teaching online
|
Pilgrim
|
Sun Jul 20, 2003 9:49 PM
|
Re: Shepherd's teaching online
|
Anonymous
|
Mon Jul 21, 2003 12:44 AM
|
Re: Shepherd's teaching online
|
Pilgrim
|
Mon Jul 21, 2003 1:25 AM
|
Re: Shepherd's teaching online
|
Anonymous
|
Mon Jul 21, 2003 1:52 AM
|
Re: Shepherd's teaching online
|
Pilgrim
|
Mon Jul 21, 2003 2:44 AM
|
Re: Shepherd's teaching online
|
Anonymous
|
Mon Jul 21, 2003 3:21 AM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Anonymous
|
Sun Jul 13, 2003 11:30 AM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Jason1646
|
Sun Jul 13, 2003 4:18 PM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Anonymous
|
Thu Jul 17, 2003 3:29 AM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Jason1646
|
Thu Jul 17, 2003 12:29 PM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
gotribe
|
Sat Jul 12, 2003 9:51 PM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
RefDoc
|
Sat Jul 12, 2003 11:33 PM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Pilgrim
|
Sun Jul 13, 2003 12:08 AM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Anonymous
|
Sun Jul 20, 2003 3:05 AM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Anonymous
|
Sat Jul 12, 2003 2:15 PM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Wes
|
Wed Jul 09, 2003 8:29 PM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
timmopussycat
|
Wed Jul 09, 2003 10:56 PM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Pilgrim
|
Thu Jul 10, 2003 1:19 AM
|
Would Edwards Call it Heresy?
|
J_Edwards
|
Thu Jul 10, 2003 9:53 PM
|
Re: Marks of Heresy
|
Theo
|
Wed Jul 09, 2003 1:07 AM
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
118
guests, and
26
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|