In reply to:
[color:"blue"]In reply to:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
read the Auburn Statement and you will have sufficient evidence
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So I was assuming there was sufficient evidence from that document alone to find what you're saying. [img]http://www.the-highway.com/w3timages/icons/confused.gif" alt="confused" title="confused[/img]

I still maintain that there is more than sufficient evidence to conclude that Doug Wilson, Barach, Watkins and Schlissel are guilty of embracing and promoting gross heresy from the "Auburn Avenue Statement" itself. The link below sums up my own reading and conclusions quite thoroughly:

The Auburn Avenue Statement: Is it Biblical?

That Wilson is in full agreement with the "Auburn Avenue Statement", besides the fact that he has endorsed it with his personal signature, can be seen in an article he wrote and published here:

"The Objectivity of the Covenant" by Doug Wilson

In His Grace,



[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]