Tom
Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 4,893
Joined: April 2001
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,349
Posts56,545
Members992
| |
Most Online2,383 Jan 12th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,615
Needs to get a Life
|
Needs to get a Life
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,615 |
Ehud states,
This is precisely what I'm debating. Is "a man" referring to the adult or both adults and infants? Since Paul’s letter is addressed to the adults in Corinth and he expects them to judge wisely (1 Cor. 10:15, etc.) it is apparent that the passage is addressed to adults, as infants: (1) could not understand, (2) could not discern, etc., etc., etc. And there would be no reason for children to have to understood or discerned since they did not partake of the LS. However, least ye forget, infants and children are to obey their parents (Eph. 6:1) and they are to be raised in the nurture and admonition of the Lord (Eph. 6:4) - part of this instruction being 1 Cor. 11:28, etc....
There were no drunken diapers to change ![[Linked Image]](http://www.the-highway.com/Smileys/rofl7.gif)
Ehud states,
Are you saying that each person eating the Passover was required to drink 4 cups of wine a piece? I did not understand this to be the case, but would like to know more. Each Jew is obligated to drink four cups of wine at these specific times during each Seder (i.e. order): the first at the start of the Seder, following Kiddush; the second before the meal, after reciting the Haggadah story; the third following the Grace After the Meal; and the last after completing Psalms of Praise (Hallel). The Four Cups represent the four expressions of deliverance promised by God (Ex. 6:6-7), "I will bring out," "I will deliver," "I will redeem," and "I will take." The Babylonian Talmud states,
"Nor shall a person have less than four cups of wine." ....Rabhina, however, said: "At all events, the four cups cannot be conjoined, for each one represents a different duty." At times a fifth cup was added symbolizing Elijah the Prophet.
Maybe where you are confused is that the children just because they did not partake of the elements still participated in the meal [at least the older children]. The children’s participation in the Passover Meal is to ask questions. For instance the youngest child would ask, "Why is this night different from all other nights?" After the asking of a specific question, the main portion of the Seder, Magid, gives over the answers in the form of a historical review. At different points in the Seder, the leader of the Seder will cover the matzot and lift his cup of wine; then put down the cup of wine and uncover the matzot — all to elicit questions from the children.
Here are some quotes from famous rabbis concerning the Passover and children:
R. Jehudah, said: "What benefit would children derive from wine? They should rather be given nuts, parched corn, etc., on the eve of Passover, so as to keep them awake at night, and that may make them inquire into the reason of the festivity."
It was said of R. Aqiba, that he would deal out nuts and parched corn on the eve of Passover to the children, in order to keep them awake and have them ask for reasons.
Boraitha, R. Eliezer said: On the night of the Passover the unleavened bread is snatched out of the children's hand in order to keep them awake and have them ask for the reason. Thus, above we see covenant inclusion, but element exclusion (just as we should have today). In addition, the Apostle Paul would not have tolerated drunken children and infants at the LS, just as he did not condone drunkenness for adults (Rom. 13:13; 1 Cor. 10:7; 11:21; Gal. 5:21; 1 Thess. 5:7). Nor, could have infants consumed four containers of wine. But of course this topic is not in Scripture, because it didn't come up? I wonder why? <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/scratch1.gif" alt="" />
Since drunkenness is a sin at the LS (1 Cor. 11:21), the children, even according to Jewish Passover custom, would not have partaken of the elements, though they would have participated in the meal in the form of asking questions, etc. and in the Passover meal had other sustenance [but not the elements] so they could have stayed awake and learned! It should be noted that the LS does not last as long as the Passover meal [festival held from the 14th to the 21st day of the Jewish month of Nisan], and thus, additional sustenance would probably be unwarranted in the modern day LS. In addition, it should be stated that in some sects of modern day Judaism (not all sects) the children [various ages depending on sect, but not infants] do participate by drinking grape juice. However, there is no evidence of this practice in the OT.
Moreover, because some desire to ridicule God's Word saying that 1 Cor 11 is the only text that speaks against paedo-communion, as if one Word of God is not sufficient to condemn their error, the counting of lambs before Passover is significant for our discussion. How many lambs? How did the Jews come up with a number? Richard Bacon recounts,
on the basis of Deuteronomy 16:2, we would expect to see participants (covenantal adult males) going to Jerusalem to keep the Passover. Additionally, on the basis of our understanding of Exodus 12:26-27, we would expect to see the children of the participants involved in catechism. Moreover, based on Exodus 12:3-4 and 12:21, we would expect to see a counting of adult males (a.k.a. "men") taking place around the time of the Passover. Finally, based on Numbers 9:1-6 and II Chronicles 30:8, we would expect to see an increased awareness and concern over ceremonial cleanness.... Jewish boys – normally thought to be 12 yoa, or older – and men partook of Passover meal. However, even Christ who was 12 yoa went to Jerusalem during Passover, but there is not a record of his participation in the Passover Meal (Luke 2:40 ff). But even if ones implies in the text that he did, Jesus "waxed strong in spirit, filled with wisdom: and the grace of God was upon him" and thus he was eligible! As Bacon states, "This was no infant at the Passover; not even the infant Savior."
In addition, John tells us in John 6:4 that the Passover was near. Why did he include this information? This explains why a great number of people were on the road. Why is this number significant? Because they had to count of males so we can discern the number of lambs needed for Passover! Moreover, notice another peculiar item about the text. While we do not know the age of the lad in the party who gave his lunch to Andrew, we may surmise from Luke 2:40 ff., that he was at least twelve years old. The Greek word that is translated "lad" in John 6:9 is paidavrion which, according to Bauer's Greek-English Lexicon, means "a youth who is no longer a child" or "a young slave." This is another hint that the numbering of the males is going on. Numbering consisted of those that partook of the Passover and included the "men of Israel." Numbering such as this is normal in biblical times (John 6:1-13 together with Matt.14:15-21, Mark 6:30-44, and Luke 9:12-17). Bacon continues,
In John 6:10, the disciples (i.e., the apostles) made the men sit down on the grass; and we are told that the men numbered about five thousand. The disciples then distributed fish and barley loaves to them that were set down (v. 11). After gathering up twelve baskets full of fragments, the passage tells us, "then those men, when they had seen . . . " (v. 14). The parallel passage in Matthew is even clearer, for in Matthew 14:21 we read, "And they that had eaten were about five thousand men, beside women and children." It is very clear that the count was of men only (not because this was Passover, but because Passover was nigh).
The word used in Matthew 14:21 is often made to read besides, as though the men were in addition to women and children who were also present but uncounted. Although that alone would be sufficient to prove that the counting for the lambs was a counting of men only, the underlying Greek is even more devastating to the paedocommunionist's view. The Greek of v. 21 is chôris gunaikon, i.e. chôris plus genitive. The primary meaning of chôris plus genitive is "separated from someone, far from someone, without someone" (e.g. I Corinthians 11:11, which reads, "Nevertheless neither is the man without the woman, neither the woman without the man, in the Lord" [emphasis added]). Note also that the cognates of this preposition have similar meanings. The verb means "divide" or "separate" and the noun, chôrismos, means "a division." So Matthew 14:21 at least teaches that the men (only) were numbered for the Passover feast.
Mark 6:44 seems also to bear this out, for Mark informs us "they that did eat of the loaves were about five thousand men." Period! Also Luke 9:13-14 says that "all this people" consisted of "about five thousand men." The only gospel that mentions women and children insists that the men were apart from them with the Passover nigh (Matthew 14:21; cf. John 6:4). Moreover, we might add that Peter was married (Matt. 8:14-15) and must ask if wives and children attended Passover, where were his in Luke 22:1f? In addition, no servants were present (Ex. 12:45; John 13:4f ). Thus, unless you are accusing the Christ of conducting an improper Passover meal, clearly, your interpretation of Scripture does injustice to God's intent for his people!
Ehud states,
If Jesus is saying "Do this as My memorial" then it is specifically Jesus who is remembering? The bow in the clouds is for the promise to the world that it will be safe from destruction of the flood. But that protection comes through God's remembering His covenant. That is a big "if" that will not hold up under scrutiny of the Holy Text. Yes Jesus is being remembered, but by WHOM is he being remembered by? Answer: YOU. The LS is not merely a memorial for God (see below)! The children aren’t capable of remembering for they have yet to have been taught by: (1) the Holy Spirit, (2) the church, (3) you, etc.
Ehud quotes Genesis 8:12f and states,
I put the recipients in bold face because they are mentioned here several times too just like in Corinthians but the memorial, I think, is clearly for God. We play no part in the sign of the rainbow [i.e. it is a mongeristic rainbow], but we do play a part in the LS [synergistic LS]! In the LS you and him do the remembering of his covenant and its stipulations Why is it that you are blind to the covenant curses enforced at the LS and mentioned by Paul for improper discernment of the elements? Clearly, the text is not merely speaking of God remembering, but of the participant to have a proper remembrance so he/she will not fall under the curse. Your system would involve bringing the covenant curse upon your own children or God failing to properly remember and then cursing his children. Which error did you choose? <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/shrug.gif" alt="" />
Ehud states,
Furthermore Paul starts chapter 10 with the eating and drinking of Israel in the wilderness that we cannot help but think that it included the children. You have three serious problems here: (1) this is a not a reference to the Passover Meal, but of the manna and water from the Rock, i.e. daily sustenance, (2) even if it was the LS how children participated is shown historically above, and (3) Paul, nor Moses, nor the Jews condone infant drunkenness! Your drunken diaper apologetic does not fit!
God provides daily sustenance for all his children (Luke 12:24f, etc.). However, the LS is for those who have understood and rightly discern the Table, just as Passover was.
Ehud states,
However, does our Lord not bid the babes to come to him? Does our Lord not bid the feeble and even the weak to come taste and see? What does it say about our understanding of the gospel when we reject the weaker baptized members of our body? The children should participate as they are part of the covenant – they just don’t partake! The LS if properly conducted should involve the children in attendance of this covenant meal so they: (1) may learn, (2) may understand, (3) may mature in grace, (4) to ask questions, etc. however they are not to partake of the elements as is apparent from church history and the text of Scripture. You have equated non-partaking with non-participation, which is not a correct hermeneutic or the idea of what the Scripture teaches. Even unrepentant sinners, not in the covenant, but attending the meal participate (the Holy Spirit can deal with them inciting them to ask, “Why can’t I partake? What makes me different from these?,” etc., compare Heb. 6:1-6), but should not partake!
|
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Paedocommunion
|
Ehud
|
Fri Jan 26, 2007 6:50 AM
|
Re: Paedocommunion
|
Pilgrim
|
Fri Jan 26, 2007 5:39 PM
|
Re: Paedocommunion
|
Ehud
|
Sat Jan 27, 2007 7:39 PM
|
Re: Paedocommunion
|
J_Edwards
|
Fri Jan 26, 2007 5:50 PM
|
Re: Paedocommunion
|
Ehud
|
Sat Jan 27, 2007 4:58 AM
|
Re: Paedocommunion
|
J_Edwards
|
Sat Jan 27, 2007 7:13 PM
|
Re: Paedocommunion
|
Ehud
|
Sat Jan 27, 2007 8:51 PM
|
Re: Paedocommunion
|
Pilgrim
|
Sat Jan 27, 2007 11:24 PM
|
Re: Paedocommunion
|
Ehud
|
Sun Jan 28, 2007 6:03 AM
|
Re: Paedocommunion
|
J_Edwards
|
Sun Jan 28, 2007 6:04 PM
|
Re: Paedocommunion
|
Ehud
|
Mon Jan 29, 2007 12:29 AM
|
Re: Paedocommunion
|
Pilgrim
|
Mon Jan 29, 2007 1:17 AM
|
Re: Paedocommunion
|
Ehud
|
Mon Jan 29, 2007 2:08 AM
|
Re: Paedocommunion
|
Pilgrim
|
Mon Jan 29, 2007 4:35 AM
|
Re: Paedocommunion
|
Ehud
|
Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:44 PM
|
Re: Paedocommunion
|
Pilgrim
|
Wed Jan 31, 2007 7:48 PM
|
asking for clarification
|
Ehud
|
Mon Feb 05, 2007 8:56 AM
|
Re: asking for clarification
|
Pilgrim
|
Mon Feb 05, 2007 8:11 PM
|
Re: asking for clarification
|
Ehud
|
Mon Feb 05, 2007 10:43 PM
|
Re: asking for clarification
|
Pilgrim
|
Tue Feb 06, 2007 12:30 AM
|
Again, I request more clarification
|
Ehud
|
Tue Feb 06, 2007 4:41 AM
|
Re: Again, I request more clarification
|
Pilgrim
|
Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:32 AM
|
Fair enough
|
Ehud
|
Tue Feb 06, 2007 6:16 AM
|
Re: Fair enough
|
Pilgrim
|
Tue Feb 06, 2007 7:04 PM
|
Re: Paedocommunion
|
J_Edwards
|
Mon Jan 29, 2007 2:34 PM
|
Re: Paedocommunion
|
Pilgrim
|
Sun Jan 28, 2007 6:44 PM
|
Re: Paedocommunion
|
Ehud
|
Sun Jan 28, 2007 10:39 PM
|
Re: Paedocommunion
|
Pilgrim
|
Sun Jan 28, 2007 10:57 PM
|
Re: Paedocommunion
|
J_Edwards
|
Sun Jan 28, 2007 1:00 AM
|
Re: Paedocommunion
|
CovenantInBlood
|
Fri Jan 26, 2007 8:17 PM
|
Re: Paedocommunion
|
Ehud
|
Fri Jan 26, 2007 11:12 PM
|
Re: Paedocommunion
|
Pilgrim
|
Fri Jan 26, 2007 11:57 PM
|
Re: Paedocommunion
|
Ehud
|
Sat Jan 27, 2007 5:08 AM
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
167
guests, and
27
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|